From: "Daniel Kral" <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: "Dominik Rusovac" <d.rusovac@proxmox.com>, <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-SERIES ha-manager/manager 0/3] fix #7557: introduce 'auto-rebalance' property
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 11:21:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIGL6E05PQ0P.32RU2R4OO94Z3@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511155734.149101-1-d.rusovac@proxmox.com>
On Mon May 11, 2026 at 5:57 PM CEST, Dominik Rusovac wrote:
> # TL;DR
> Add 'auto-rebalance' property to HA resources config, which gives users
> control over which HA resources may be moved by dynamic CRS during
> automatic rebalancing.
>
> # Details
> The 'auto-rebalance' flag is set to true by default. As requested by [0],
> disabling 'auto-rebalance' for some HA resource, say vm:100, means that vm:100
> will be disregarded as a migration candidate during auto-rebalancing. Any HA
> resource with a positive affinity for vm:100 will be disregarded too.
>
> # Summary of Changes
> This series:
> - introduces property to control whether an HA resource may be migrated during
> automatic rebalancing;
> - adds corresponding flag to PVE UI.
>
> # Refs
> [0] https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7557
Tested the series and it works just as expected:
- only a single HA resource with auto-rebalance cleared; set
imbalance-threshold to 0.1 and imbalance-margin to 0.05, put no load
on node3, some load on node2 and a lot of load with a non-HA VM and
the HA resource from above, but it was never moved to the other nodes;
it was moved to node3 as soon as I set auto-rebalance again
- tested the same with a positive resource affinity rule with that HA
resource and another new HA resource and they never moved away unless
I set the auto-rebalance option for all again
Nice work, thanks for the quick patch series!
Would be great to document this in the documentation as well so users
are aware especially that if such HA resources are in a resource
affinity rule, that they make the whole resource bundle immovable. But
this can also be done as a follow-up.
Consider this as:
Tested-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 15:57 [PATCH-SERIES ha-manager/manager 0/3] fix #7557: introduce 'auto-rebalance' property Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-11 15:57 ` [PATCH pve-manager 1/3] ui: ha: add auto-rebalance flag Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-12 9:05 ` Daniel Kral
2026-05-11 15:57 ` [PATCH pve-ha-manager 2/3] manager: set service config value in self Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-12 9:06 ` Daniel Kral
2026-05-12 11:55 ` Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-11 15:57 ` [PATCH pve-ha-manager 3/3] fix #7557: introduce 'auto-rebalance' property Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-12 9:07 ` Daniel Kral
2026-05-12 11:51 ` Dominik Rusovac
2026-05-12 9:21 ` Daniel Kral [this message]
2026-05-12 11:53 ` [PATCH-SERIES ha-manager/manager 0/3] " Dominik Rusovac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DIGL6E05PQ0P.32RU2R4OO94Z3@proxmox.com \
--to=d.kral@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.rusovac@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox