Re: [PATCH datacenter-manager 4/4] ui: auto-installer: make the fqdn field a large field

["Lukas Wagner" <l.wagner@proxmox.com>]

On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:33 PM CEST, Shannon Sterz wrote:
> especially with template variables the content of this field can get
> fairly long. also moves the "FQDN from DHCP" and "Pin Network
> Interfaces" around to match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Sterz <s.sterz@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  ui/src/remotes/auto_installer/prepared_answer_form.rs | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ui/src/remotes/auto_installer/prepared_answer_form.rs b/ui/src/remotes/auto_installer/prepared_answer_form.rs
> index 28f4851..c1d2bab 100644
> --- a/ui/src/remotes/auto_installer/prepared_answer_form.rs
> +++ b/ui/src/remotes/auto_installer/prepared_answer_form.rs
> @@ -323,11 +323,11 @@ pub fn render_network_options_form(
>                  .disabled(use_dhcp_network)
>                  .required(!use_dhcp_network),
>          )
> -        .with_right_field(
> +        .with_field(
>              tr!("FQDN from DHCP"),
>              Checkbox::new().name("use-dhcp-fqdn").default(false),
>          )
> -        .with_right_field(
> +        .with_large_field(
>              tr!("Fully-Qualified Domain Name (FQDN)"),
>              Field::new()
>                  .name("fqdn")
> @@ -346,8 +346,7 @@ pub fn render_network_options_form(
>                  })
>                  .required(!use_dhcp_fqdn),
>          )
> -        .with_right_field("", DisplayField::new().key("dummy"))
> -        .with_right_field(
> +        .with_field(
>              tr!("Pin Network Interfaces"),
>              Checkbox::new()
>                  .name("netif-name-pinning-enabled")

makes sense generally, but after this change the "Network Options" tabs
is a bit weird to look at, since now the network configuration fields
still span half the dialog width, without there being a second column.

Maybe we should use the same proportions as on the first page of the
wizard, so just a single column with broader labels?