public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH manager 0/2] ceph: pool: create EC pools from an existing profile
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:56:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s8opkx3tm0j.fsf@toolbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021054425.3271742-1-k.chai@proxmox.com> (Kefu Chai's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:44:23 +0800")

Kefu Chai <k.chai@proxmox.com> writes:

Comments on each patch.

> Hi,
>
> the docs suggest building a custom erasure code profile with the Ceph
> tools and then passing it to 'pveceph pool create' as 'profile'. That
> doesn't actually work right now, since the schema still wants 'k' and
> 'm':
>
>   # pveceph pool create test-ec --erasure-coding profile=default
>   400 Parameter verification failed.
>   erasure-coding.m: property is missing and it is not optional
>   erasure-coding.k: property is missing and it is not optional
>
> Patch 2 makes 'k' and 'm' optional when a profile is given. If they are
> passed anyway, they now have to match the profile, where they used to be
> ignored. So a script that passed placeholder values next to a profile
> would now get an error, which I think is the safer choice, but I'm not
> sure everyone agrees.
>
> Patch 1 needs to go in first. destroypool removes the pool's profile by
> default, so once patch 2 makes 'profile=default' easy, destroying such a
> pool would take 'default' with it. With patch 1 it only removes the
> profile createpool made for that pool, unless asked to.
>
> Both patches come with tests in a new test/CephPool_test.pl, and I tried
> creating and destroying such pools on a three node test cluster.
> Feedback welcome, especially on the stricter check in patch 2.

The patches look good to me modulo small nits, none of which is a
blocker on its own.

PS: I did not review the tests.

Reviewed-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>

-- 
Maximiliano




      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21  5:44 [PATCH manager 0/2] ceph: pool: create EC pools from an existing profile Kefu Chai
2026-10-21  5:44 ` [PATCH manager 1/2] api: ceph: pool: destroypool: keep EC profiles pveceph did not create Kefu Chai
2026-10-21  9:31   ` Maximiliano Sandoval
2026-10-21  5:44 ` [PATCH manager 2/2] api: ceph: pool: createpool: make 'k' and 'm' optional with a profile Kefu Chai
2026-10-21  9:52   ` Maximiliano Sandoval
2026-10-21  9:56 ` Maximiliano Sandoval [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s8opkx3tm0j.fsf@toolbox \
    --to=m.sandoval@proxmox.com \
    --cc=k.chai@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal