From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>, pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 qemu-server] cloud-init: commit: activate volume early enough to fix regression with qcow2 on LVM
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 13:25:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec564e23-08ee-4f72-b3fc-850a0e02a469@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817103032.73185-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>
one small comment inline
On 8/17/26 12:30 PM, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Since pve-storage commit 05032c5 ("fix #7811: storage: lvm: reject
> allocation on format and volume name mismatch") and its follow-ups,
> cloud-init disks are named with a '.qcow2' extension on LVM storages
> with snapshot-as-volume-chain enabled.
>
> This causes a regression, because volume_size_info() fails and returns
> undef when the qcow2 volume is not active. When the size cannot be
> determined, commit_cloudinit_disk() function assumes that the disk
> does not yet exist and tries to allocate new disk with the same name,
> which fails.
>
> # qm start 100
> failed to stat '/dev/lvm/vm-100-cloudinit.qcow2'
> Rounding up size to full physical extent 8.00 MiB
> lvcreate 'lvm/vm-100-cloudinit.qcow2' error: Logical Volume
> "vm-100-cloudinit.qcow2" already exists in volume group "lvm"
>
> Fix the issue by activating the volume early enough.
>
> Note that activate_volumes() also activates the storage, which fixes
> another bug, since nothing ensured that the storage was active before.
> For a VM with just the cloud-init disk on the 'nfs' storage:
>
> # umount /mnt/pve/nfs && qm start 100
> failed to stat '/mnt/pve/nfs/images/100/vm-100-cloudinit.raw'
> disk image '/mnt/pve/nfs/images/100/vm-100-cloudinit.raw' already exists
>
> Once there is a proper existence check function in the storage layer,
> that can be used instead. For vdisk_list(), not all plugin
> implementations filter early for $vollist, so there can be overhead
> and some plugins even might fail when there are issues with unrelated
> volumes. Even if using an eval block, if the cloud-init volume already
> exists, but vdisk_list() fails, it would be detected as the volume not
> existing and then allocation would fail. The current approach with
> activation avoids that an issue with a different volume blocks VM
> start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Mention that activating the storage early enough is important too.
> * Different approach, because vdisk_list() failing for unrelated
> volumes should really not block start.
>
> src/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm b/src/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
> index c1311da8..c6a83126 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/QemuServer/Cloudinit.pm
> @@ -39,16 +39,34 @@ sub commit_cloudinit_disk {
> my $scfg = PVE::Storage::storage_config($storecfg, $storeid);
> my $format = checked_volume_format($storecfg, $drive->{file});
>
> + # Some kinds of volumes, like qcow2 on LVM, need to be active to query the size. Note that this
> + # also activates the storage. Failure is expected if the volume does not exist.
> + # TODO use a proper existence check once there is a storage function for it. For vdisk_list(),
> + # not all plugin implementations filter early for $vollist, so there can be overhead and some
> + # plugins even might fail when there are issues with unrelated volumes.
> + eval { PVE::Storage::activate_volumes($storecfg, [$drive->{file}]); };
> + my $activation_error = $@;
> +
> my $size = eval { PVE::Storage::volume_size_info($storecfg, $drive->{file}) };
> if (!defined($size) || $size <= 0) {
> $volname =~ m/(vm-$vmid-cloudinit(.\Q$format\E)?)/;
> my $name = $1;
> $size = 4 * 1024;
> - PVE::Storage::vdisk_alloc($storecfg, $storeid, $vmid, $format, $name, $size);
> +
> + eval { PVE::Storage::vdisk_alloc($storecfg, $storeid, $vmid, $format, $name, $size); };
> + if (my $err = $@) {
> + # Log the activation failure from earlier, since it might be relevant. The volume might
> + # have existed and the failed activation might be the cause of not getting a size.
> + warn $activation_error;
this should probably be 'warn $activation_error if
defined($activation_error);'
since the activation might have succeeded, depending on the storage
plugin (or if the file is empty)?
(not a big issue though, at worst, there is a stray 'something went
wrong' line in the logs)
> + die $err;
> + }
> + PVE::Storage::activate_volumes($storecfg, [$drive->{file}]);
> +
> $size *= 1024; # vdisk alloc takes KB, qemu-img dd's osize takes byte
> + } elsif ($activation_error) {
> + # The volume does exist, so abort if activation failed.
> + die $activation_error;
> }
> - my $plugin = PVE::Storage::Plugin->lookup($scfg->{type});
> - $plugin->activate_volume($storeid, $scfg, $volname);
>
> print "generating cloud-init ISO\n";
> eval {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 10:29 [PATCH v2 qemu-server] cloud-init: commit: activate volume early enough to fix regression with qcow2 on LVM Fiona Ebner
2026-08-17 11:25 ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
2026-08-17 11:29 ` Fiona Ebner
2026-08-17 12:29 ` applied: " Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ec564e23-08ee-4f72-b3fc-850a0e02a469@proxmox.com \
--to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox