public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: superseded: [PATCH common/network 0/3] Performance improvements for applying VLAN / QinQ zones
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 13:27:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1947384b-d89a-49ef-a221-33c51c14dee0@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709132857.239615-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>

https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20261019112640.181849-2-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/T/#t

On 7/9/26 3:28 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> ## Problem
> 
> When creating a VLAN / QinQ zone on a non VLAN-aware bridge, the SDN config
> generation enters a code path that calls ip_link_details from PVE::IPRoute2
> repeatedly. This causes a severe slowdown when applying configurations with a
> large amount of VNets. What exacerbated this problem was that, aside from
> calling iproute2 twice, every vnet recalculated the bridge ports for its bridge
> by iterating over all existing interfaces on the host which leads to a quadratic
> increase in runtime once the SDN configuration had been applied once.
> 
> ## Solution
> 
> This patch series introduces a new helper to pve-common that pre-computes the
> bridge port mappings used in the SDN config generation. The SDN stack then calls
> that function once at the beginning of the 'Apply' step, then re-uses the result
> for each vnet. This avoids calling iproute2 repeatedly and the nested loop
> inside the generate_sdn_config function in the VLAN / QinQ plugins.
> 
> An initial approach only cached the ip_link_details output and reused that, but
> this approach did not avoid the nested loops, so I opted for pre-calculating the
> required information instead and passing only that to the zone plugins. The
> first patch is a remnant of the initial approach, which was still included
> because it is useful for the other callsites.
> 
> ## Benchmarks
> 
> This slashes the runtime for generating the SDN configuration considerably on a
> test setup with 1000 VLAN VNets present on the host / config:
> 
> Without these patches applied:
> 
>   root@pve-vlan-test:~# time perl -e 'use PVE::Network::SDN; PVE::Network::SDN::generate_raw_etc_network_config(PVE::Network::SDN::compile_running_cfg(1))'
>   real    5m59.853s
>   user    5m49.009s
>   sys     0m34.887s
> 
> With these patches applied:
> 
>   root@pve-vlan-test:~# time perl -e 'use PVE::Network::SDN; PVE::Network::SDN::generate_raw_etc_network_config(PVE::Network::SDN::compile_running_cfg(1))'
>   real    0m0.868s
>   user    0m0.818s
>   sys     0m0.109s
> 
> ## Future Work
> 
> This patch series does not address any bottlenecks in ifupdown2, which is now
> the limiting factor when applying large configurations. Applying a SDN
> configuration via ifreload with 1000 VLANs takes 22 seconds. I'll be exploring
> potential improvements there with Christoph, but currently we do not have high
> hopes of improving the runtime there considerably.
> 
> Currently the SDN configuration is applied sequentially on each node, I'll be
> looking into creating a patch series that applies the network configuration in
> parallel.
> 
> 
> pve-common:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (2):
>   iproute2: restructure get_physical_bridge_ports
>   iproute2: add helper for getting bridge port mappings
> 
>  src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> pve-network:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (1):
>   fix #7738: zones: use pre-computed bridge port list
> 
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Zones.pm            |  3 +++
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/Plugin.pm     |  7 +------
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/QinQPlugin.pm |  5 +++--
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Zones/VlanPlugin.pm |  5 +++--
>  src/test/run_test_zones.pl              | 13 ++++++++++---
>  5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Summary over all repositories:
>   6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 





      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-19 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-09 13:28 [PATCH common/network 0/3] Performance improvements for applying VLAN / QinQ zones Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-09 13:28 ` [PATCH pve-common 1/3] iproute2: restructure get_physical_bridge_ports Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-27 16:13   ` Lukas Sichert
2026-09-18  9:04   ` Gabriel Goller
2026-07-09 13:28 ` [PATCH pve-common 2/3] iproute2: add helper for getting bridge port mappings Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-28 12:00   ` Lukas Sichert
2026-07-09 13:28 ` [PATCH pve-network 3/3] fix #7738: zones: use pre-computed bridge port list Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-28 11:58   ` Lukas Sichert
2026-09-18  9:04 ` [PATCH common/network 0/3] Performance improvements for applying VLAN / QinQ zones Gabriel Goller
2026-09-18  9:27 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-10-19 11:27 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1947384b-d89a-49ef-a221-33c51c14dee0@proxmox.com \
    --to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal