From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC pve-network 1/1] sdn: apply changes on all nodes in parallel
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:21:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17ce3fca-ab64-426a-b72c-2cb6b12ea4fe@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aq0H2zjuv0HfE7PJ@luna.proxmox.com>
On 9/18/26 11:50 AM, Gabriel Goller wrote:
> A few small nits inline, no blockers though.
> Otherwise LGTM
>
> Consider:
> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm b/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
>> index e3c8d9dd..dd2cf05a 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ use PVE::Cluster qw(cfs_lock_file cfs_read_file cfs_write_file);
>> use PVE::Exception qw(raise_param_exc);
>> use PVE::JSONSchema qw(get_standard_option);
>> use PVE::RESTHandler;
>> +use PVE::RESTEnvironment qw(log_warn);
>> use PVE::RPCEnvironment;
>> use PVE::SafeSyslog;
>> use PVE::Tools qw(run_command extract_param);
>> @@ -107,30 +108,6 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> },
>> });
>>
>> -my $create_reload_network_worker = sub {
>> - my ($nodename, $regenerate_frr) = @_;
>> -
>> - my @command = ('pvesh', 'set', "/nodes/$nodename/network");
>> - push(@command, '--regenerate-frr', $regenerate_frr);
>> -
>> - # FIXME: how to proxy to final node ?
>> - my $upid;
>> - print "$nodename: reloading network config\n";
>> - run_command(
>> - \@command,
>> - outfunc => sub {
>> - my $line = shift;
>> - if ($line =~ /["']?(UPID:[^\s"']+)["']?$/) {
>> - $upid = $1;
>> - }
>> - },
>> - );
>> - #my $upid = PVE::API2::Network->reload_network_config({ node => $nodename });
>> - my $res = PVE::Tools::upid_decode($upid);
>> -
>> - return $res->{pid};
>> -};
>> -
>> __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> name => 'lock',
>> protected => 1,
>> @@ -282,6 +259,41 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> },
>> });
>>
>> +sub create_api_client {
>> + my ($request_timeout) = @_;
>> +
>> + my $rpcenv = PVE::RPCEnvironment::get();
>> + my $authuser = $rpcenv->get_user();
>> + my $credentials = $rpcenv->get_credentials();
>> +
>> + my $api_token = $credentials->{api_token};
>> + my $ticket = $credentials->{ticket};
>> + my $csrf_token = $credentials->{token};
>> +
>> + my $node = PVE::INotify::nodename();
>> + my $fingerprint = PVE::Cluster::get_node_fingerprint($node);
>> +
>> + my $conn_args = {
>> + protocol => 'https',
>> + host => 'localhost', # always call the api locally, let pveproxy handle the proxying
>> + port => 8006,
>> + username => $authuser,
>> + ticket => $ticket,
>> + apitoken => $api_token,
>> + timeout => $request_timeout // 25, # default slightly shorter than the proxy->daemon timeout
>> + cached_fingerprints => {
>> + $fingerprint => 1,
>> + },
>> + };
>> +
>> + my $api_client = PVE::APIClient::LWP->new($conn_args->%*);
>> + if (defined($csrf_token)) {
>> + $api_client->update_csrftoken($csrf_token);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return $api_client;
>> +}
>> +
>> __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> name => 'reload',
>> protected => 1,
>> @@ -291,6 +303,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> permissions => {
>> check => ['perm', '/sdn', ['SDN.Allocate']],
>
> Hmm this endpoint has SDN.Allocate and the PUT /network endpoint we are calling
> (in pve-manager) needs Sys.Modify. This shouldn't be an issue, but maybe we
> should require Sys.Modify here as well to short-circuit everything, instead of
> making a request to every node.
Hmm, pre-existing, but what about setups where a user has Sys.Modify only on some nodes? That's
currently possible but probably quite bad, since it allows applying the SDN configuration to
some nodes only. So, I agree - but a breaking change?
>> },
>> + expose_credentials => 1,
>> parameters => {
>> additionalProperties => 0,
>> properties => {
>> @@ -336,22 +349,56 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>> my $regenerate_frr = ($previous_config_has_frr || $new_config_has_frr) ? 1 : 0;
>>
>> my $code = sub {
>> - $rpcenv->{type} = 'priv'; # to start tasks in background
>> PVE::Cluster::check_cfs_quorum();
>> +
>> + my $api_client = create_api_client();
>> my $nodelist = PVE::Cluster::get_nodelist();
>> +
>> + my $tasks = {};
>> +
>> for my $node (@$nodelist) {
>> - my $pid = eval { $create_reload_network_worker->($node, $regenerate_frr) };
>> - warn $@ if $@;
>> + print "$node: reloading network config\n";
>> +
>> + my $upid = eval {
>> + $api_client->put(
>> + "/nodes/$node/network",
>> + {
>> + 'regenerate-frr' => $regenerate_frr,
>> + },
>> + );
>> + };
>> +
>> + if ($@) {
>> + log_warn("$node: could not reload network configuration: $@\n");
>> + next;
>> + }
>> +
>> + $tasks->{$upid} = $node;
>> }
>>
>> - # FIXME: use libpve-apiclient (like in cluster join) to create
>> - # tasks and moitor the tasks.
>> + print "waiting for reload tasks to finish\n";
>>
>> - return;
>> + while ($tasks->%*) {
>> + for my $upid (keys $tasks->%*) {
>> + my $node = $tasks->{$upid};
>> + my $task = eval { $api_client->get("/nodes/$node/tasks/$upid/status") };
>> +
>> + if ($@) {
>> + log_warn("could not get status of reload task: $@\n");
>> + delete $tasks->{$upid};
>> + next;
>> + }
>
> Hmm should we wait more than 1 second here maybe? What if the reload brings the
> network down shortly... Maybe add a counter and require a task to be gone for
> 3-4 seconds?
yes, potentially even a re-try logic before giving up completely...
>> +
>> + next if $task->{status} eq 'running';
>
> Should we add a exitstatus check here and print a warning like "reload failed"
> or something?
>
>> + print "$node: reload task finished\n";
>> + delete $tasks->{$upid};
>> + }
>> +
>> + sleep(1);
>
> Do the pve tasks have a maximum duration where they get killed if they take
> longer? Otherwise a stuck task will make this loop forever.
>
> Although this is a task as well isn't it -- it can just be force-stopped in
> the ui.
Should be fine imo, due to the possibility of cancelling the task itself.
>> + }
>> };
>>
>> return $rpcenv->fork_worker('reloadnetworkall', undef, $authuser, $code);
>> -
>> },
>> });
>>
>> --
>> 2.47.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 14:06 [RFC pve-network 1/1] sdn: apply changes on all nodes in parallel Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-13 8:58 ` Daniel Herzig
2026-09-18 9:50 ` Gabriel Goller
2026-09-18 11:21 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]
2026-09-18 11:28 ` Gabriel Goller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17ce3fca-ab64-426a-b72c-2cb6b12ea4fe@proxmox.com \
--to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
--cc=g.goller@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox