From: Daniel Herzig <d.herzig@proxmox.com>
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [RFC pve-network 1/1] sdn: apply changes on all nodes in parallel
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 10:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldbfe063.fsf@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260709140625.275618-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Thanks for working on this!
I've tested the patch in 2 scenarios on a three-node cluster:
(1) Worst case (by using VLAN tag 1 on a VNet
backed by a VLAN aware management bridge with default settings)
(2) Good case (doing the same, but using VLAN tag 3 on the same bridge)
Apart from the (expected) instant breaking of the network in case (1)
the patch leads to a more consistent state as previously. The earlier
sequential approach lead to inconsistent configuration states across the
clusternodes (depending on which node was reached first, or -- to which
node access to the management-IP was lost first). So I'd see the
parallel approach as an enhancement in the worst-case setup.
Case (2) just worked nicely, and makes application quite somewhat faster.
I haven't gone through further-reaching implications yet, but my first
impression of the patch is quite good by empirical testing of the above
situations.
Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com> writes:
> Utilize the API client to spawn tasks on each node and then monitor
> the progress of the tasks via the API as well. This allows for
> starting the reload tasks in parallel. It is particularly useful for
> large setups, where applying the SDN configuration can take a
> considerable amount of time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> Sending this as an RFC, as this requires careful testing imo.
>
> An example where this change could backfire has been encountered
> recently. A user applied the SDN configuration, which broke the
> cluster / management network of the node that was carrying out the
> reload network task. Since it was executed sequentially, only one node
> was affected. In this scenario, with this patch applied, the whole
> cluster would have been down.
>
> We could potentially provide an option that limits the amount of nodes
> where the reload task runs in parallel and expose that in the UI?
>
> Also, currently the task could never fail and errors were shown in the
> respective reload tasks executed on the nodes, I've kept that behavior
> the same, but introduced warnings if there are any issues with API
> calls.
>
> src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm b/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
> index e3c8d9dd..dd2cf05a 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ use PVE::Cluster qw(cfs_lock_file cfs_read_file cfs_write_file);
> use PVE::Exception qw(raise_param_exc);
> use PVE::JSONSchema qw(get_standard_option);
> use PVE::RESTHandler;
> +use PVE::RESTEnvironment qw(log_warn);
> use PVE::RPCEnvironment;
> use PVE::SafeSyslog;
> use PVE::Tools qw(run_command extract_param);
> @@ -107,30 +108,6 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> },
> });
>
> -my $create_reload_network_worker = sub {
> - my ($nodename, $regenerate_frr) = @_;
> -
> - my @command = ('pvesh', 'set', "/nodes/$nodename/network");
> - push(@command, '--regenerate-frr', $regenerate_frr);
> -
> - # FIXME: how to proxy to final node ?
> - my $upid;
> - print "$nodename: reloading network config\n";
> - run_command(
> - \@command,
> - outfunc => sub {
> - my $line = shift;
> - if ($line =~ /["']?(UPID:[^\s"']+)["']?$/) {
> - $upid = $1;
> - }
> - },
> - );
> - #my $upid = PVE::API2::Network->reload_network_config({ node => $nodename });
> - my $res = PVE::Tools::upid_decode($upid);
> -
> - return $res->{pid};
> -};
> -
> __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> name => 'lock',
> protected => 1,
> @@ -282,6 +259,41 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> },
> });
>
> +sub create_api_client {
> + my ($request_timeout) = @_;
> +
> + my $rpcenv = PVE::RPCEnvironment::get();
> + my $authuser = $rpcenv->get_user();
> + my $credentials = $rpcenv->get_credentials();
> +
> + my $api_token = $credentials->{api_token};
> + my $ticket = $credentials->{ticket};
> + my $csrf_token = $credentials->{token};
> +
> + my $node = PVE::INotify::nodename();
> + my $fingerprint = PVE::Cluster::get_node_fingerprint($node);
> +
> + my $conn_args = {
> + protocol => 'https',
> + host => 'localhost', # always call the api locally, let pveproxy handle the proxying
> + port => 8006,
> + username => $authuser,
> + ticket => $ticket,
> + apitoken => $api_token,
> + timeout => $request_timeout // 25, # default slightly shorter than the proxy->daemon timeout
> + cached_fingerprints => {
> + $fingerprint => 1,
> + },
> + };
> +
> + my $api_client = PVE::APIClient::LWP->new($conn_args->%*);
> + if (defined($csrf_token)) {
> + $api_client->update_csrftoken($csrf_token);
> + }
> +
> + return $api_client;
> +}
> +
> __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> name => 'reload',
> protected => 1,
> @@ -291,6 +303,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> permissions => {
> check => ['perm', '/sdn', ['SDN.Allocate']],
> },
> + expose_credentials => 1,
> parameters => {
> additionalProperties => 0,
> properties => {
> @@ -336,22 +349,56 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> my $regenerate_frr = ($previous_config_has_frr || $new_config_has_frr) ? 1 : 0;
>
> my $code = sub {
> - $rpcenv->{type} = 'priv'; # to start tasks in background
> PVE::Cluster::check_cfs_quorum();
> +
> + my $api_client = create_api_client();
> my $nodelist = PVE::Cluster::get_nodelist();
> +
> + my $tasks = {};
> +
> for my $node (@$nodelist) {
> - my $pid = eval { $create_reload_network_worker->($node, $regenerate_frr) };
> - warn $@ if $@;
> + print "$node: reloading network config\n";
> +
> + my $upid = eval {
> + $api_client->put(
> + "/nodes/$node/network",
> + {
> + 'regenerate-frr' => $regenerate_frr,
> + },
> + );
> + };
> +
> + if ($@) {
> + log_warn("$node: could not reload network configuration: $@\n");
> + next;
> + }
> +
> + $tasks->{$upid} = $node;
> }
>
> - # FIXME: use libpve-apiclient (like in cluster join) to create
> - # tasks and moitor the tasks.
> + print "waiting for reload tasks to finish\n";
>
> - return;
> + while ($tasks->%*) {
> + for my $upid (keys $tasks->%*) {
> + my $node = $tasks->{$upid};
> + my $task = eval { $api_client->get("/nodes/$node/tasks/$upid/status") };
> +
> + if ($@) {
> + log_warn("could not get status of reload task: $@\n");
> + delete $tasks->{$upid};
> + next;
> + }
> +
> + next if $task->{status} eq 'running';
> + print "$node: reload task finished\n";
> + delete $tasks->{$upid};
> + }
> +
> + sleep(1);
> + }
> };
>
> return $rpcenv->fork_worker('reloadnetworkall', undef, $authuser, $code);
> -
> },
> });
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-09 14:06 [RFC pve-network 1/1] sdn: apply changes on all nodes in parallel Stefan Hanreich
2026-07-13 8:58 ` Daniel Herzig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ldbfe063.fsf@proxmox.com \
--to=d.herzig@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox