From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Arthur Bied-Charreton <a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com>,
pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH proxmox-backup] docs: notifications: fix broken calendar match examples
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 00:00:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea412c1b-fc19-4490-8105-c7113191d85e@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723114548.319543-1-a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com>
Am 23.07.26 um 13:45 schrieb Arthur Bied-Charreton:
> The calendar matcher examples showed weekday ranges as start-end. The
> correct syntax is start..end - these example configs do not parse.
>
> Update the examples to the correct a..b range syntax.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Bied-Charreton <a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com>
> ---
> docs/notifications.rst | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/notifications.rst b/docs/notifications.rst
> index 440c700a4..7d6517dd7 100644
> --- a/docs/notifications.rst
> +++ b/docs/notifications.rst
> @@ -217,8 +217,8 @@ Examples:
>
> * ``match-calendar 8-12``
Shouldn't above also change? or is that hours? These examples here
would IMO do very well with actually explaining what each means, it's
not exactly clear as it stands. A reference to the calendar events
appendix at _calendar-event-scheduling would already help a lot and
might we warranted either way, if this here is really using that format.
> * ``match-calendar 8:00-15:30``
> -* ``match-calendar mon-fri 9:00-17:00``
FWIW; systemd-analyze calendar "mon-fri" works, but it does normalize
it to mon..fri
> -* ``match-calendar sun,tue-wed,fri 9-17``
> +* ``match-calendar mon..fri 9:00-17:00``
> +* ``match-calendar sun,tue..wed,fri 9-17``
>
> Field Matching Rules
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> @@ -417,4 +417,3 @@ Counter Threshold Description and Usage
> ``s3-download`` Amount of bytes downloaded from the S3 endpoint,
> independent of request method.
> ==================== ==========================================================
> -
extra line removal, but fine as clean-up to tag along I guess.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 11:45 [PATCH proxmox-backup] docs: notifications: fix broken calendar match examples Arthur Bied-Charreton
2026-07-23 22:00 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ea412c1b-fc19-4490-8105-c7113191d85e@proxmox.com \
--to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=a.bied-charreton@proxmox.com \
--cc=pbs-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox