From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: "Friedrich Weber" <f.weber@proxmox.com>,
"Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>,
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH cluster 1/5] add functions to determine warning level for high token timeouts
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:28:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHXU9FLPOIKK.25YB1OD27GQ8Q@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0d4baa9-8e7e-4cc5-8117-c8cf0bfc74b0@proxmox.com>
On Fri Apr 17, 2026 at 10:33 AM CEST, Friedrich Weber wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> +sub calculate_total_timeout {
>
> I think "total timeout" is a little too vague, especially because it's
> also user-facing. I don't think totem/corosync have a term for "sum of
> token and consensus timeout", and "sum of token and consensus timeout"
> is a too long. Perhaps something like "recovery timeout" -- though not
> perfect because "Recovery" is a specific state in the totem state
> machine. Maybe "membership convergence timeout" (though that's a bit
> long and obscure)?
Thanks for having a look at this and for your feedback. I agree that the
naming is a bit too vague, though I really wasn't sure what else to name
it. I think calculate_membership_convergence_timeout could work. As an
alternative suggestion, what do you think of
calculate_cluster_reformation_timeout? Of course that's also a more
"verbose" name, but I think it describes the effects of the timeout
quite well.
>
>> + my ($totemcfg, $node_count) = @_;
>> +
>> + my $token_timeout = $totemcfg->{token} // 3000;
>> + my $token_coefficient = $totemcfg->{token_coefficient} // 650;
>> +
>> + my $expected_token_timeout = $token_timeout;
>> + if ($node_count > 2) {
>> + $expected_token_timeout += ($node_count - 2) * $token_coefficient;
>> + }
>> +
>> + my $expected_consensus_timeout = $totemcfg->{consensus} // $expected_token_timeout * 1.2;
>> + return ($expected_token_timeout + $expected_consensus_timeout) / 1000.0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +sub get_timeout_warning_level {
>> + my ($total_timeout_secs) = @_;
>> +
>> + if ($total_timeout_secs > 50) {
>> + return 'change-strongly-recommended';
>
> I realize I'm the source of these numbers :) But since >50 is actually
> pretty bad already, if we phrase it as "strongly recommended" we can
> probably go for a slightly lower number:
>
> - > 45: change-strongly-recommended
> - > 40: change recommended
> - > 30: optimize
will lower them for a v2, thanks! :) I'd already wondered about the
thresholds when I implemented this, but thought it'd make sense to start
with the values from the bugzilla.
>
>> + } elsif ($total_timeout_secs > 40) {
>> + return 'change-recommended';
[snip]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 14:43 [PATCH cluster/manager 0/5] add warning messages for high token timeouts in clusters Michael Köppl
2026-03-30 14:43 ` [PATCH cluster 1/5] add functions to determine warning level for high token timeouts Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:33 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-04-20 8:28 ` Michael Köppl [this message]
2026-04-20 9:39 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-04-20 13:50 ` Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:33 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-03-30 14:43 ` [PATCH cluster 2/5] pvecm: warn users of high token timeouts when using nodes command Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:33 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-04-20 13:33 ` Michael Köppl
2026-03-30 14:43 ` [PATCH cluster 3/5] api: add token timeout and warning level to cluster join info Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:33 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-03-30 14:43 ` [PATCH manager 4/5] ui: cluster info: move initialization of items to initComponent Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:33 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-03-30 14:43 ` [PATCH manager 5/5] ui: cluster info: warn users of high token timeout in join info Michael Köppl
2026-04-17 8:34 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-04-17 8:33 ` [PATCH cluster/manager 0/5] add warning messages for high token timeouts in clusters Friedrich Weber
2026-04-20 16:44 ` superseded: " Michael Köppl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHXU9FLPOIKK.25YB1OD27GQ8Q@proxmox.com \
--to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.weber@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.