public inbox for yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>, yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH yew-comp] wizard: fix page unlocking with advanced fields
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 13:15:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afd88365-cb15-4f42-ad7d-f2f74108a4d0@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e045704-3111-4036-b7c7-72be60a50c40@proxmox.com>

Am 28.05.26 um 12:54 schrieb Dominik Csapak:
> On 5/28/26 12:20 PM, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> Maybe "fix page validation with advanced fields" as that's what's fixed,
>> the unlocking is then just an effect of that (can edit that on applying).
> 
> yes that's fine with me, should i send a v2 or is it fine to simply
> fix it up on applying?

I'll fix that up, thx.

>> FWIW, for the auto installer answer file wizard I'd like to add a
>> "free_navigation" option to the wizard, with that then one can navigate
>> through all steps freely from the start. Needs validity handling on submit
>> and a small UI hint for invalid tabs in the bar for UX though, which is a bit
>> more work and that's why I skipped adding it yesterday.
> 
> maybe then a wizard is not actually what we want here, but maybe a
> manual tabpanel which marks the tabs with a fa-triangle-exclamation
> or something if it's not valid?

I thought about that, but I like the wizard form of having a guided "next"
and (here still missing) final summary and confirmation page for some flows.
And I really see no essential clash with having all steps available with the
guided wizard approach itself in general, i.e. not a must, but can be totally
fine; this allows power users some more flexibility while guiding less
experienced users better.

But I agree that this needs some special care, the UI/UX polishing for this
can make the difference between a great feature or confusion, so I'd like to
flesh out and validate what I have in mind a bit more in-depth before doing
anything here.




  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  9:18 [PATCH yew-comp] wizard: fix page unlocking with advanced fields Dominik Csapak
2026-05-28 10:20 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2026-05-28 10:55   ` Dominik Csapak
2026-05-28 11:15     ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2026-05-28 11:17 ` applied: " Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afd88365-cb15-4f42-ad7d-f2f74108a4d0@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
    --cc=yew-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal