Re: [PVE-User] API redundancy

[Fabio Martins <proxmox@x9p.org>]

Demand easily included with a few diffs/additional packages. Likely your 
proposition will be caught by a dev - meanwhile, you can do that even 
with DNS / HAProxy / nginx / iptables / etc... as already suggested.

--Fabio

On 3/14/25 15:19, Cyrus wrote:
> Hello!,
>
> Yes, I can do it outside with a reverse proxy.
>
> The message I'm rescuing: there's no transparent HA included out of the box
> to cover that scenario
>
> Regards.
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025, 14:59 Roberto Alvarado <ralvarado@anycast.cl> wrote:
>
>> You can do this with nginx or haproxy, using each pve server as backend.
>>
>>
>> Saludos
>> Roberto
>>
>> On 14-03-25 13:59, Cyrus wrote:
>>> Hello!,
>>>
>>> Understanding there's not cluster IP (failover), how do you provide
>>> redundancy for API consumers when one node is not accesible?
>>>
>>> (User configured with API endpoint https://pve01:8006, pve01 going down,
>>> pve02 accesible)
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pve-user mailing list
>>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-user mailing list
>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>
-- 
Att.

(+5521) 97914-8106 (Signal)
PHOSPHORUS NETWORKS | HNO3 SYSTEMS
https://www.linkedin.com/in/fabio1337br/


_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user