From: "Alain Péan" <alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Edit: Boot Order mask
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:15:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da7f1512-5fa6-1bb4-a878-7035f8100454@c2n.upsaclay.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c3d06aa-1bf8-ca1b-e826-3d2615685b9d@riminilug.it>
Le 14/04/2021 à 09:37, Piviul a écrit :
> I Alain, first of all thank you very much indeed to you and to all
> people answered this thread. I reply your message but the infos here
> should answer even the infos asked from Alwin...
>
> I send directly the output differences from the command pveversion
> with -v flag because all three nodes show the same
> "pve-manager/6.3-6/2184247e (running kernel: 5.4.106-1-pve)" version.
>
> So I have launched the following command in all three nodes:
>
> # pveversion -v > pveversion.$(hostname)
>
> obtaining 3 differents files and I've done the diff between the first
> two files (referring to pve01 and pve02) and as expected there is no
> difference:
>
> $ diff pveversion.pve0{1,2}
>
> Then I have done the diff between the first and the third node and
> this is the result:
>
> $ diff pveversion.pve0{1,3}
> 5d4
> < pve-kernel-5.3: 6.1-6
> 8,9c7
> < pve-kernel-5.3.18-3-pve: 5.3.18-3
> < pve-kernel-5.3.10-1-pve: 5.3.10-1
> ---
> > pve-kernel-5.4.34-1-pve: 5.4.34-2
>
> there are some little differences yes but in kernel that are not in
> use any more (in all 3 nodes uname -r shows 5.4.106-1-pve)...
>
> Attached you can find all three files hoping the system doesn't cut them.
>
> Please can I ask you if you have a 6.3 node in your installations that
> was previously in 6.2 version (i.e. not installed directly in 6.3
> version)? Can you tell me if the "Boot order" musk is the one with
> only combo boxes or the more evoluted drag and drop musk?
Hi Piviul,
I don't think only a difference in kernel could explain this difference
in the web interface, if the other packages are the same. Did you try to
clear the cache in your web browsers ?
The attached files are indeed there. I looked at the versions, and all
three appears up to date, so for me, the only origin that I can suppose
could be the browser cache.
Alain
--
Administrateur Système/Réseau
C2N Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001)
Boulevard Thomas Gobert (ex Avenue de La Vauve), 91120 Palaiseau
Tel : 01-70-27-06-88 Bureau A255
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-13 8:05 Piviul
2021-04-13 8:57 ` Alain Péan
2021-04-14 7:37 ` Piviul
2021-04-14 16:15 ` Alain Péan [this message]
2021-04-15 14:03 ` Piviul
2021-04-16 14:16 ` Piviul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da7f1512-5fa6-1bb4-a878-7035f8100454@c2n.upsaclay.fr \
--to=alain.pean@c2n.upsaclay.fr \
--cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox