public inbox for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
@ 2022-04-15 14:02 Сергей Цаболов
       [not found] ` <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Сергей Цаболов @ 2022-04-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

Hi to all,

I have the  6 node Proxmox VE cluster + Ceph installed (all node is 
PowerEdge R440)

Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ?

I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or not?


Sergey TS
The best Regard
______________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
From mir@miras.org  Fri Apr 15 16:16:36 2022
Return-Path: <mir@miras.org>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3F29D463
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B682C48B9
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id EE8FE48A8
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:16:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net
 [83.93.223.153])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC9D4030F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DDD120ED6
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h=
 content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references
 :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date;
 s=dkim; t=1650032156; x=1650896157; bh=ngkAMoai5woyCgUPF36OxO9Q
 pbxUmTWUlIXZg8P5G+I=; b=Yl3Peg440FZZTmq8oE59boGM6p2qewl/ZwXu06vE
 IlBeDXjL/Qi2LTdgwKMYQL29bjFEWSXoZxh43fZDdc0IxWY8FDsD5JJr8w25DDvd
 LepzbUGFZcgaJMYCIplsCWNV/+xZP5lbcMCXwED8bbXRS8Oo0CXglCynDbrsEWLi
 GC0=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net
Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 8hTfnZRGWXdk for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8281A120D96
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:15:57 +0200
From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
Message-ID: <20220415161557.677231fd@sleipner.datanom.net>
In-Reply-To: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
References: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt
X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=;
 <u7g2~aE~I k%*K{!Q#D)Vaiiqy~hxUz_8)mTt:m#WPV$ls:"s,.;p7SNdq>PR}nK
Face: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.858 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:16:36 -0000

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:02:13 +0300
=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2 <tsabolov@t8.ru> wrote:

>=20
> Need I Configure Hardware Watchdog / IPMI Fencing ?
>=20
> I'm a little confused do I need to do something in this direction or
> not?
>=20
The software watchdog comes configured out of the box and with fencing
etc. and works extremely well. I would bother configuring the hardware
watchdog.

--=20
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Keep out of the sunlight.

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZfh0ACgkQx3wR4Emg
bmYpbgf+Id4WkkNRm3kZyu+i2NkwjAUHnQ8nIqi0cFCWV15A6Gsl1o5uB5lbzoSn
kQdd2ekTXhgvkW1LlvQY3ts5WJKeCBzhN2GpkK8ZCiHxnF/o/+sLEJRWXaD96Hzr
CWti9N7WlNjRURSrnMt701PABnX5Up1sgZ5tpyX7Mz0wI72K/5UEYaDBPASBWpiP
KwpPzqBOFs20kqv2oUZdeqe1oy2BXbFKcjmhwPOipINvD5j4boPBYuAUPIGoLeHz
WWq4r/Ozgge/MIQ5lw6ebqo36ivyYkL+VepxVldhtMhlsMTZBzbKyYQWMgHKSYbH
qIDSNyVyRcZgbHZ1/I+Lja0D2GvE9w==
=ii/l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/HM.xNXg7W49pAttcbLc/aDh--



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
       [not found]   ` <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
@ 2022-04-15 14:48     ` Сергей Цаболов
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Сергей Цаболов @ 2022-04-15 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

Thanks for answers,

I understand the configure hardware watchdog is not the best way.

How I can change the Timer  when the 1 node from the cluster lost 
connectivity ( shutdown the switch)  go the reboot ?

Is possible change the timer ?



15.04.2022 17:23, Michael Rasmussen via pve-user пишет:
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
Sergey TS
The best Regard
______________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
From mir@miras.org  Fri Apr 15 18:01:01 2022
Return-Path: <mir@miras.org>
X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E71D461
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:01:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8DD836353
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.eu (mail.datanom.eu [188.166.46.182])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id AAF7C6344
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.datanom.net (83-93-223-153-cable.dk.customer.tdc.net
 [83.93.223.153])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.datanom.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138574030F
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFF3120ED7
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=miras.org; h=
 content-type:content-type:mime-version:x-mailer:references
 :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:to:from:from:date:date;
 s=dkim; t=1650038428; x=1650902429; bh=nLCnUhOt/iW0crQO4/tMJmHS
 3TQRZyYDi+rePzXNtM0=; b=QbjRhuE44tF+oZZIbYLJ1sVE9vVgUveftAhp0SFc
 wF2v1q7bdrR17KZBfplW2EApLm+UXFKGJcMJc9dGLHAyXaHeImj7K3T55ApcKLJB
 YQpAl1QyL4qlX2+O/1eGAjowMFKNsKjrRiQoo9spzeO6h5/vFM9mX6MhH9bijGvS
 VQ0=
X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.datanom.net
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at iredmail.datanom.net
Received: from mail.datanom.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (iredmail.datanom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ZhZhrsAdMZMm for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>;
 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sleipner.datanom.net (unknown [192.168.2.79])
 by mail.datanom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC47A120D96
 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:26 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:00:27 +0200
From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org>
To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer
Message-ID: <20220415180027.7d25dc74@sleipner.datanom.net>
In-Reply-To: <cd411741-224a-3b0e-7aa0-7415146bfcd9@t8.ru>
References: <d22938b2-3656-3e7f-b2b7-845f2aaf6056@t8.ru>
 <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
 <746cb313-1ee4-8481-6904-a261634202e9@t8.ru>
 <20220415165642.0e5b20cb@sleipner.datanom.net>
 <cd411741-224a-3b0e-7aa0-7415146bfcd9@t8.ru>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0git4 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-GPG-KEY: ftp://ftp.datanom.net/pub/claws/gpg-key.txt
X-Face: +UpSPFkh3^t&rI|{Ou$3/l]vjTk; D5c0k; *3p?O2c+:bV#y*0q4EWQ[Kdd2=;
 <u7g2~aE~I k%*K{!Q#D)Vaiiqy~hxUz_8)mTt:m#WPV$ls:"s,.;p7SNdq>PR}nK
Face: 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
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results:  0
 AWL 0.686 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
 BAYES_00                 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
 DKIM_SIGNED               0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
 not necessarily valid
 DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
 DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
 domain
 DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from
 domain
 KAM_SHORT               0.001 Use of a URL Shortener for very short URL
 SPF_HELO_NONE           0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 SPF_PASS               -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE    -0.01 -
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:01:01 -0000

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 18:17:26 +0300
=D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2 <tsabolov@t8.ru> wrote:

> Thank you for answer.
>=20
> Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the timeout value is quite
> small.
>=20
> If node lost connection after 2 min is go to reboot is good
> practices, I won't argue with you, maybe you're right.
>=20

For the last 10 years I have been using Proxmox I have not have a lost
connection to a server for over 1 sec without it being intentionally
but if your circumstances is another usecase I would go for stackable
switches I have a port for either switch connected to my servers and
UPS control for all my servers.

Loosing connection to a server for more than 1 sec can only mean
hardware failure or loss of power.

>=20
> 15.04.2022 17:56, Michael Rasmussen =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 17:48:12 +0300
> > =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=
=BE=D0=B2<tsabolov@t8.ru>  wrote:
> > =20
> >> Is possible change the timer ?
> >> =20
> > AFAIK this requires changes to the watchdog code. To the best of my
> > knowledge the timeout is configured according to best practices.
> >
> > Why do you want to change the timeout value?
> > =20
> =D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC
> =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 =D0=A6=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=BE=
=D0=B2
> =D0=A1=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BC=D0=BD=D1=8B=D0=B9 =D0=90=D0=B4=D0=BC=
=D0=B8=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=81=D1=82=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80 =D0=9E=D0=9E=
=D0=9E "=D0=A28"
> =D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BB.: +74992716161
> =D0=9C=D0=BE=D0=B1: +79850334875
> logo_T8rus <https://t8.ru>
>=20
> tsabolov@t8.ru
> =D0=9E=D0=9E=D0=9E =C2=AB=D0=A28=C2=BB, 107076, =D0=B3. =D0=9C=D0=BE=D1=
=81=D0=BA=D0=B2=D0=B0
> =D0=9A=D1=80=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B1=D0=BE=D0=B3=D0=B0=D1=82=D1=8B=
=D1=80=D1=81=D0=BA=D0=B0=D1=8F =D1=83=D0=BB., =D0=B4. 44, =D1=81=D1=82=D1=
=80.1
> www.t8.ru <https://t8.ru/>



--=20
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=3D0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
(Never thought I'd be telling Malcolm and Ilya the same thing... :-)
		-- Larry Wall in <199711071819.KAA29909@wall.org>

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEX3FAW1ccuO4qQUpPx3wR4EmgbmYFAmJZlpsACgkQx3wR4Emg
bmb5ewf/YC7oNtX/ZIZW7AN0ociDi1obbjCGl+Z96svLX3huIY4nmtZ764zCoKIN
V1UJ8oSrcXp7eAP4b6Drxdi/Un9CfL6fVhFOTi5XdT8MHAnoU516zPhh99neiFlX
u8a1nvjkIJ4v+mJgCk2T996geYPHl/Uh6D/wXMPH+AllzmnIcRjOHu7huXe3h+Xl
OwAIUKDzHdq6kk5fB9JIKx9nExsm1/bwjA6XYszrdmDhYNDoeW3iBPMMmxynYcHC
+1qB23dwQGzlmRtYnRF0e7iMtgyTlqTR9VjNTIP1yK/odfm7KdXhpslyyb+V9gYg
9QMEibXfNGOtGxCtLxUiIO5FKAzXBA==
=+uXM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/=NFLv9desMWs7E8p+K+nggT--



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-15 14:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-15 14:02 [PVE-User] PowerEdge R440 & watchdog timer Сергей Цаболов
     [not found] ` <mailman.275.1650032197.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
     [not found]   ` <mailman.276.1650032585.377.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2022-04-15 14:48     ` Сергей Цаболов

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal