* Re: [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd?
[not found] <78619bca-8468-43e7-a67e-00f82f6c9cd7@gmail.com>
@ 2024-10-03 22:10 ` Kyle Schmitt
2024-10-03 23:03 ` John Crisp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Schmitt @ 2024-10-03 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox VE user list
For an alternate point of view, unless does away with support for
everything other systemd-networkd, please don't change. Dealing with my
production systems, most of these systemd changes feel like change for
change's sake, not progress. And I haven't had pleasant experiences with
systemd-networkd in production environments.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 7:20 PM Uwe Sauter <uwe.sauter.de@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Proxmox team, hi all,
>
>
> I stumbled across an article over at lwn.net:
>
> ===
> Debating ifupdown replacements for Debian trixie
>
> Debian does not have an official way to configure networking. Instead, it
has four [1] recommended ways to configure
> networking, one of which is the venerable ifupdown [2], which has been
part of Debian since the turn of the century and
> is showing its age. A conversation about its maintainability and possible
replacement with ifupdown‑ng [3] has led to
> discussions about the default network-management tools for Debian
"trixie" [4] (Debian 13, which is expected in 2025)
> and beyond. No route to consensus has been found, yet.
> ===
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ifupdown
> [3] https://github.com/ifupdown-ng/ifupdown-ng
> [4] https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/
>
>
> Having made good experiences with systemd-networkd on Debian, Rocky Linux
and Arch Linux I was wondering whether Proxmox
> is working towards using systemd-networkd as the configuration tool in
one of the next major versions?
>
>
> Best,
>
> Uwe
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd?
2024-10-03 22:10 ` [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd? Kyle Schmitt
@ 2024-10-03 23:03 ` John Crisp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Crisp @ 2024-10-03 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox VE user list
On 4 October 2024 00:10:45 CEST, Kyle Schmitt <kyleaschmitt@gmail.com> wrote:
>For an alternate point of view, unless does away with support for
>everything other systemd-networkd, please don't change. Dealing with my
>production systems, most of these systemd changes feel like change for
>change's sake, not progress. And I haven't had pleasant experiences with
>systemd-networkd in production environments.
+1
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-03 23:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <78619bca-8468-43e7-a67e-00f82f6c9cd7@gmail.com>
2024-10-03 22:10 ` [PVE-User] Any plans to migrate to systemd-networkd? Kyle Schmitt
2024-10-03 23:03 ` John Crisp
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox