public inbox for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leandro Roggerone <leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar>
To: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at>
Cc: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject)
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:11:09 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALt2oz6bdm8JXytFX-cwmbDsiO3WXO7mvequQDnB87Ef2UMV+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1aca635b-412d-c199-2382-629b16457939@holub.co.at>

ok , guys  ... I think I will add a third box but it will take some time.
Meanwhile:
Currently i'm using following repo:

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib
# security updates
deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
contrib

I have never run any manual upgrade however the system is running the
apt-get update command once a day.
a) Does It means I should not try to go back to the buster repo ?


b)Since Im still running pve 6 , if It is possible to fix my repolist ,
wich should I use ?
Before I got the update alert I was using this:

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster main contrib
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates main contrib
# security updates
deb http://security.debian.org buster/updates main contrib

c) Is it possible to confirm if some packages have been upgraded ?
So I can decide to whether to go back to buster , keep using bullseye.
d) If there is no chance to change the repolist to the proper one , should
I disable automatic updates to avoid the system crashes ?

Thanks guys.
Leandro.




<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

El mar, 24 ago 2021 a las 14:21, Martin Holub (<martin@holub.co.at>)
escribió:

> Hi Leandro,
>
> So if you can't schedule a downtime for, at least, some VMs i would add a
> 3rd Box. Also in terms of having a valid Quorum a 3rd Box would be a good
> thing.
>
> About the Upgrade, as Alain pointed out, there is no way to accidentially
> upgrade, at least if you don't put "bullseye" in the sources.list manually
> (like you did, that's why i asked about the Upgrade). So just make shure
> you explicitly use "buster", not "stable" or "bullseye" in the Debian repo.
> If apt still complains about the release change just run an update using
> "apt-get update --allow-releaseinfo-change", this should fix things you. If
> you already upgraded some packages from the bullseye repo i would keep
> things running as they are for now (obviously nothing broke by now, so
> don't touch it...) and start planning the Upgrade to 7.0. The Upgrade to
> 7.0 was hassle free for the Clusters i ran it by now. Also telling from
> Forum and Mailing Lists, i wouldn't expect any issues as long as you don't
> have any special setups with PCI passthrough Devices or something like
> that.
>
> Best
> Martin
> Am 24.08.21 um 17:13 schrieb Leandro Roggerone:
>
> Hello , Martin.
> Im still in pve 6.04.
> I was looking at the document you pointed out (Upgrade from 6.x to 7.0)
> It is frustrating to see that upgrading  is a very difficult process.
> My cluster contains 2 servers.
> Both are in production , at 50 - 60 % storage and memory capacity so it is
> not easy for me to create backups and move VMs.
>
> I will study how to proceed with this update from pve 6  to 7.
> Perhaps:
> Adding a third new box already running version 7.
> Adding a networking storage ? need to check out wich one.
>
> Meanwhile , until I can go to pve 7 , I think I should upgrate to latest
> pve 6 and disable automatic upgrades ...
> Do you think it is ok ?
>
> Thanks for your words!!
> Leandro.
>
>
> El mié, 18 ago 2021 a las 14:58, Martin Holub (<martin@holub.co.at>)
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Leandro,
>>
>> Are you already on PVE7? Otherwise, just changing the Sources to
>> Bullseye, i'm pretty shure that this will break things, or at least produce
>> unwanted results. If you want to upgrade to Debian Bullseye better check
>> https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Upgrade_from_6.x_to_7.0
>>
>> Best regards
>> Martin
>> Am 18.08.21 um 15:19 schrieb Leandro Roggerone:
>>
>> thanks Martin.
>> According to documentation , for a non subscription environment ,this is
>> how it should looks like:
>>
>> root@pve:/etc/apt# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
>> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib
>>
>> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib
>>
>> # security updates
>> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main
>> contrib
>>
>> After running apt-get update from cli , it did not return any error.
>> seems to be working ok now.
>> Thanks again.
>> Leandro.
>>
>> El mar, 17 ago 2021 a las 11:44, Martin Holub via pve-user (<
>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>) escribió:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at>
>>> To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>> Cc:
>>> Bcc:
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:43:30 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject)
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Aug 14th "Bullseye" was released, therefore Buster moved from
>>> "stable" to "oldstable" and Bullseye became the new "stable" Version of
>>> Debian.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> Am 17.08.21 um 16:37 schrieb Leandro Roggerone:
>>> > root@pve:~# apt-get update
>>> > Get:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease [65.4 kB]
>>> > Get:2 http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster InRelease [122 kB]
>>> > Get:3 http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease [51.9 kB]
>>> > Reading package lists... Done
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > E: Repository 'http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease'
>>> changed
>>> > its 'Suite' value from 'stable' to 'oldstable'
>>> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository
>>> can
>>> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details.
>>> > E: Repository 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster InRelease' changed
>>> its
>>> > 'Suite' value from 'stable' to 'oldstable'
>>> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository
>>> can
>>> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details.
>>> > E: Repository 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease'
>>> > changed its 'Suite' value from 'stable-updates' to 'oldstable-updates'
>>> > N: This must be accepted explicitly before updates for this repository
>>> can
>>> > be applied. See apt-secure(8) manpage for details.
>>> >
>>> > This is my source.list
>>> > root@pve:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
>>> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster main contrib
>>> >
>>> > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian buster-updates main contrib
>>> >
>>> > # security updates
>>> > deb http://security.debian.org buster/updates main contrib
>>> >
>>> > This was working ok until sat 14.
>>> > Any idea ?
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > <
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>> >
>>> > Libre
>>> > de virus. www.avast.com
>>> > <
>>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>> >
>>> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > pve-user mailing list
>>> > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>> > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Martin Holub via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
>>> To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>> Cc: Martin Holub <martin@holub.co.at>
>>> Bcc:
>>> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 16:43:30 +0200
>>> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] (no subject)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pve-user mailing list
>>> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
>>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>>>
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Libre
>> de virus. www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>
>>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-17 14:37 Leandro Roggerone
     [not found] ` <mailman.458.1629211453.329.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2021-08-18 13:19   ` Leandro Roggerone
     [not found]     ` <e5a1f5ef-ab9b-9283-cd90-6aba6acc35ba@holub.co.at>
2021-08-24 15:13       ` Leandro Roggerone
2021-08-24 15:36         ` Alain Péan
     [not found]         ` <1aca635b-412d-c199-2382-629b16457939@holub.co.at>
2021-08-25 12:11           ` Leandro Roggerone [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-08-29 23:11 Christian Karg
     [not found] <CAGehcqHmTqfjBRwt61hWjjA1CQm8inajfS0=EOqCPrAdmGUheA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-07-24  8:58 ` Aaron Lauterer
2021-02-25 20:18 Aaron Wood
2021-02-26 11:17 ` Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALt2oz6bdm8JXytFX-cwmbDsiO3WXO7mvequQDnB87Ef2UMV+Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=leandro@tecnetmza.com.ar \
    --cc=martin@holub.co.at \
    --cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal