public inbox for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto
       [not found] <CAGP6POL6n3zJ+fcys_uAiBgFsAn7saF4D1V=fiCjDGY=13sThQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2021-03-03  9:16 ` aderumier
  2021-03-03 17:06   ` Dimitri Alexandris
  2021-03-04  0:24   ` Hongyi Zhao
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: aderumier @ 2021-03-03  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

if you use ifupdown2, it'll use "auto ..."

this is because ifupdown2 is able to manage relationship.

The web interface will setup correct configuration for you if you use
ifupdown2 or ifupdown1.




Le mardi 02 mars 2021 à 12:23 +0800, Hongyi Zhao a écrit :
> If I create an OVS Bridge with the Autostart option using pve's web
> interface, the following configuration will be generated:
> 
> auto vmbr0
> iface vmbr0 inet manual
> ovs_type OVSBridge
> 
> OTOH, the examples given on the wiki website
> <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Open_vSwitch> use the following format:
> 
> allow-ovs vmbr0
> iface vmbr0 inet manual
>   ovs_type OVSBridge
> 
> So, I want to know if the "allow-ovs" and "auto" keywords are
> equivalent in the context for my above scenario. Any hints will be
> appreciated.
> 
> Regards



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto
  2021-03-03  9:16 ` [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto aderumier
@ 2021-03-03 17:06   ` Dimitri Alexandris
  2021-03-04  0:24   ` Hongyi Zhao
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dimitri Alexandris @ 2021-03-03 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

All of my proxmox (5) have allow-ovs in every vmbr.


On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 11:16 AM <aderumier@odiso.com> wrote:

> if you use ifupdown2, it'll use "auto ..."
>
> this is because ifupdown2 is able to manage relationship.
>
> The web interface will setup correct configuration for you if you use
> ifupdown2 or ifupdown1.
>
>
>
>
> Le mardi 02 mars 2021 à 12:23 +0800, Hongyi Zhao a écrit :
> > If I create an OVS Bridge with the Autostart option using pve's web
> > interface, the following configuration will be generated:
> >
> > auto vmbr0
> > iface vmbr0 inet manual
> > ovs_type OVSBridge
> >
> > OTOH, the examples given on the wiki website
> > <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Open_vSwitch> use the following format:
> >
> > allow-ovs vmbr0
> > iface vmbr0 inet manual
> >   ovs_type OVSBridge
> >
> > So, I want to know if the "allow-ovs" and "auto" keywords are
> > equivalent in the context for my above scenario. Any hints will be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto
  2021-03-03  9:16 ` [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto aderumier
  2021-03-03 17:06   ` Dimitri Alexandris
@ 2021-03-04  0:24   ` Hongyi Zhao
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hongyi Zhao @ 2021-03-04  0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Proxmox VE user list

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 5:16 PM <aderumier@odiso.com> wrote:
>
> if you use ifupdown2, it'll use "auto ..."

Yes, see below for more info:

root@pve:~# dpkg --get-selections |grep ifupdown2
ifupdown2                                       install

> this is because ifupdown2 is able to manage relationship.
>
> The web interface will setup correct configuration for you if you use
> ifupdown2 or ifupdown1.

Thanks a lot for pointing this out.

HY

>
> Le mardi 02 mars 2021 à 12:23 +0800, Hongyi Zhao a écrit :
> > If I create an OVS Bridge with the Autostart option using pve's web
> > interface, the following configuration will be generated:
> >
> > auto vmbr0
> > iface vmbr0 inet manual
> > ovs_type OVSBridge
> >
> > OTOH, the examples given on the wiki website
> > <https://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Open_vSwitch> use the following format:
> >
> > allow-ovs vmbr0
> > iface vmbr0 inet manual
> >   ovs_type OVSBridge
> >
> > So, I want to know if the "allow-ovs" and "auto" keywords are
> > equivalent in the context for my above scenario. Any hints will be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Regards
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-user mailing list
> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user



-- 
Assoc. Prof. Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com>
Theory and Simulation of Materials
Hebei Polytechnic University of Science and Technology engineering
NO. 552 North Gangtie Road, Xingtai, China



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <CAGP6POL6n3zJ+fcys_uAiBgFsAn7saF4D1V=fiCjDGY=13sThQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-03-03  9:16 ` [PVE-User] allow-ovs vs auto aderumier
2021-03-03 17:06   ` Dimitri Alexandris
2021-03-04  0:24   ` Hongyi Zhao

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal