public inbox for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: duluxoz <duluxoz@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>,
	Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Problem With Bond & VLANs - Help Please
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:42:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534f2488-4441-43eb-9767-5e20b531f6b3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <822bb310-e82f-4690-bf83-a73cbe957959@proxmox.com>

Hi Stephan,

My apologises, I should have been more precise.

What doesn't work? Most of the ifaces are down (won't come up 
automatically as I expect (not even NIC3)), and so I have no 
connectivity to the LAN, let alone the rest of the outside world.

Yes, each VLAN should have its own gateway - each VLAN is its own 
subnet, of course.

Results of `ip r`:

~~~
default via 10.0.200.1 dev vmbr0 proto kernal onlink linkdown
10.0.100.0/24 dev bond0.100 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.100.0 linkdown
10.0.200.0/24 dev bond0.200 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.0 linkdown
10.0.200.0/24 dev vmbr0 proto kernal scope link src 10.0.200.100 linkdown
~~~

Results of `ip a`:

~~~
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN 
group default qlen 1000
   link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
   inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
     valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
   inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute
     valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eno0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group 
default qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eno1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group 
default qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: eno2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group 
default qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:1b:21:e4:a6:f6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,MASTER,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc 
noqueue master vmbr0 state DOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: bond0.100@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc 
noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.0.100.0/24 scope global bond0.100
     valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
7: bond0.200@bond0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc 
noqueue state LOWERLAYERDOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.0.200.0/24 scope global bond0.200
     valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
8: vmbr0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue 
state DOWN group default qlen 1000
   link/ether 4a:3a:67:59:ac:d3 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
   inet 10.0.200.100/24 scope global vmbr0
     valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
~~~

Thanks for taking a look

Cheers

dulux-oz


On 16/8/24 19:53, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
>
> On 8/16/24 09:36, duluxoz wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Disclaimer: I'm coming from an EL background - this is my first venture
>> into Debian-world  :-)
>>
>> So I'm having an issue getting the NICs, Bond, and VLANs correctly
>> configured on a new Proxmox Node (Old oVirt Node). This worked on the
>> old oVirt config (abit a different set of config files/statements).
>>
>> What I'm trying to achieve:
>>
>>   * Proxmox Node IP Address: 10.0.200.100/24, Tag:VLAN 200
>>   * Gateway: 10.0.200.1
>>   * Bond: NIC1 (eno0) & NIC2 (eno1), 802.3ad
>>   * VLAN bond0.100: 10.0.100.0/24, Gateway 10.0.100.1
>>   * VLAN bond0.200: 10.0.200.0/24, Gateway 10.0.200.1
>>   * NIC3 (eno2): 10.0.300.100/24 - not really relevant, as its not part
>>     of the Bond, but I've included it to be thorough
> What *exactly* doesn't work?
> Does the configuration not apply? Do you not get any connectivity with
> internet / specific networks?
>
>
> First thing that springs to mind is that you cannot configure two
> default gateways. There can only be one default gateway. You can
> configure different gateways for different subnets / interfaces. Or you
> can configure different routing tables for different processes.
>
> Your current configuration specifies three gateways. I assume you want
> to use different gateways for different subnets?
>
>
> How does the output of the following commands look like?
>
> ip a
> ip r
_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-16  7:36 duluxoz
2024-08-16  8:05 ` Christian Kivalo
2024-08-16  9:43   ` duluxoz
2024-08-16  9:53 ` Stefan Hanreich
2024-08-16 10:42   ` duluxoz [this message]
2024-08-16 11:26     ` Gilberto Ferreira
2024-08-16 11:26     ` proxmox
2024-08-16 11:32     ` proxmox
2024-08-18 11:14 duluxoz
2024-08-18 14:07 ` Gilberto Ferreira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534f2488-4441-43eb-9767-5e20b531f6b3@gmail.com \
    --to=duluxoz@gmail.com \
    --cc=matthew@peregrineit.net \
    --cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal