* [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept [not found] ` <649afeba-9626-6688-7967-3ee604eea2bb@suma-informatika.hr> @ 2022-08-17 5:39 ` Tonči Stipičević [not found] ` <mailman.66.1660809003.345.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> [not found] ` <000c2ab6-ea94-1979-57af-c2f20ba47e2a@suma-informatika.hr> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Tonči Stipičević @ 2022-08-17 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: PVE User List Hello to all a new customer of mine has shared san storage connected to two hosts (XEN cluster at the moment). The plan is to migrate to Proxmox, but I'm using mostly ZFS concept and HA clusters w/o shared (SAN) storage , and my head point/feature is ZFS storage replication . Now I'm wandering is there any possibility to take advantage of this SAN storage in the "ZFS world"? I'm afraid not , but still hoping ... I really like feature zfs-storage-repl which means that VMs can be very quckly ready on another host/cluster (w/o need for backup/restore option) But, SAN storage by itself is already redundant though ... Thank very much in advance for your opinions/advices BR Tonci srdačan pozdrav / best regards Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. direktor / manager SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management mob: 091 1234003 www.suma-informatika.hr ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <mailman.66.1660809003.345.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>]
* Re: [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept [not found] ` <mailman.66.1660809003.345.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> @ 2022-08-23 14:30 ` Kyle Schmitt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Kyle Schmitt @ 2022-08-23 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Proxmox VE user list For what it's worth, I did have proxmox setup at work with a dedicated box providing LVM lvs as iSCSI, and mdadm-raid6 underneath. It worked OK, but the added complexity is more trouble than it's worth. My current work doesn't use proxmox, but my personal setup right now is ZFS RAIDZ2 on SSDs, shared on a seperate network via NFS to my 3 proxmox hosts. --Kyle On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:50 AM Michael Rasmussen via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> wrote: > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org> > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:36:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:39:22 +0200 > Tonči Stipičević <tonci@suma-informatika.hr> wrote: > > > Now I'm wandering is there any possibility to take advantage of this > > SAN storage in the "ZFS world"? I'm afraid not , but still hoping > > ... I really like feature zfs-storage-repl which means that VMs can > > be very quckly ready on another host/cluster (w/o need for > > backup/restore option) > > > > But, SAN storage by itself is already redundant though ... > > > > Thank very much in advance for your opinions/advices > > > > You could look at the zfs-over-iscsi provided the SAN is cable of: > 1) Using ZFS as filesystem > 2) Exposing volumes as LUN's > 3) Running SSHD > > It is not a shareable filesystem like NFS but more like a disk for a > specific VM which can be accessed from a number of Proxmox nodes but > only allowing access from a specific Proxmox node at any given time. > > -- > Hilsen/Regards > Michael Rasmussen > > Get my public GnuPG keys: > michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc > https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=0xD3C9A00E > mir <at> datanom <dot> net > https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=0xE501F51C > mir <at> miras <dot> org > https://pgp.key-server.io/pks/lookup?search=0xE3E80917 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > 'During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a > revolutionary act.' -George Orwell > > /usr/games/fortune -es says: > Not that I have anything much against redundancy. But I said that > already. -- Larry Wall in <199702271735.JAA04048@wall.org> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Rasmussen via pve-user <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> > To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > Cc: Michael Rasmussen <mir@miras.org> > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:36:21 +0200 > Subject: Re: [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <000c2ab6-ea94-1979-57af-c2f20ba47e2a@suma-informatika.hr>]
[parent not found: <0faa5905-9eec-3ecd-4a66-a6fbeb089525@dhzm.nl>]
* Re: [PVE-User] PVE 7.2.-14 LXC boot problem [not found] ` <0faa5905-9eec-3ecd-4a66-a6fbeb089525@dhzm.nl> @ 2022-11-19 7:44 ` Tonči Stipičević 2022-11-20 9:36 ` [PVE-User] password failure CFS 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Tonči Stipičević @ 2022-11-19 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: j.raats, PVE User List That's it ! ... Thank you srdačan pozdrav / best regards Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. direktor / manager SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management mob: 091 1234003 www.suma-informatika.hr On 18. 11. 2022. 22:42, Jack Raats wrote: > Logon your proxmox server and install binutils using > > apt install binutils > > That solved the problem on my proxmox server > > Gr., > Jack Raats > > > > Op 18-11-2022 om 21:23 schreef Tonči Stipičević: >> Hello to all, >> after today's upgrade from 7.2-11 to 7.2.14 LXC's won't boot >> >> run_buffer: 321 Script exited with status 2 >> lxc_init: 847 Failed to run lxc.hook.pre-start for container "109" >> __lxc_start: 2008 Failed to initialize container "109" >> TASK ERROR: startup for container '109' failed >> >> lxc-start 109 20221118200745.382 INFO confile - >> ../src/lxc/confile.c:set_config_idmaps:2267 - Read uid map: type u >> nsid 0 hostid 100000 range 65536 >> lxc-start 109 20221118200745.382 INFO confile - >> ../src/lxc/confile.c:set_config_idmaps:2267 - Read uid map: type g >> nsid 0 hostid 100000 range 65536 >> lxc-start 109 20221118200745.383 INFO lsm - >> ../src/lxc/lsm/lsm.c:lsm_init_static:38 - Initialized LSM security >> driver AppArmor >> lxc-start 109 20221118200745.383 INFO conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_script_argv:337 - Executing script >> "/usr/share/lxc/hooks/lxc-pve-prestart-hook" for container "109", >> config section "lxc" >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.295 DEBUG conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_buffer:310 - Script exec >> /usr/share/lxc/hooks/lxc-pve-prestart-hook 109 lxc pre-start produced >> output: objdump on /lib/systemd/systemd failed: open3: exec of >> objdump -p /var/lib/lxc/109/rootfs/lib/systemd/systemd failed: No >> such file or directory at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/Tools.pm line 455. >> >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.321 ERROR conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_buffer:321 - Script exited with status 2 >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.321 ERROR start - >> ../src/lxc/start.c:lxc_init:847 - Failed to run lxc.hook.pre-start >> for container "109" >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.321 ERROR start - >> ../src/lxc/start.c:__lxc_start:2008 - Failed to initialize container >> "109" >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.321 INFO conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_script_argv:337 - Executing script >> "/usr/share/lxcfs/lxc.reboot.hook" for container "109", config >> section "lxc" >> lxc-start 109 20221118200747.827 INFO conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_script_argv:337 - Executing script >> "/usr/share/lxc/hooks/lxc-pve-poststop-hook" for container "109", >> config section "lxc" >> lxc-start 109 20221118200749.635 DEBUG conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_buffer:310 - Script exec >> /usr/share/lxc/hooks/lxc-pve-poststop-hook 109 lxc post-stop produced >> output: umount: /var/lib/lxc/.pve-staged-mounts/mp0: not mounted. >> >> lxc-start 109 20221118200749.636 DEBUG conf - >> ../src/lxc/conf.c:run_buffer:310 - Script exec >> /usr/share/lxc/hooks/lxc-pve-poststop-hook 109 lxc post-stop produced >> output: command 'umount -- /var/lib/lxc/.pve-staged-mounts/mp0' >> failed: exit code 32 >> >> lxc-start 109 20221118200749.737 ERROR lxc_start - >> ../src/lxc/tools/lxc_start.c:main:306 - The container failed to start >> lxc-start 109 20221118200749.738 ERROR lxc_start - >> ../src/lxc/tools/lxc_start.c:main:311 - Additional information can be >> obtained by setting the --logfile and --logpriority options >> >> >> Host restart, restore from bck , ... nothing helps >> >> so take caution .... >> >> srdačan pozdrav / best regards >> >> Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. >> direktor / manager >> >> SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 >> >> Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke >> Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management >> >> mob: 091 1234003 >> www.suma-informatika.hr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pve-user mailing list >> pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] password failure 2022-11-19 7:44 ` [PVE-User] PVE 7.2.-14 LXC boot problem Tonči Stipičević @ 2022-11-20 9:36 ` CFS 2022-11-20 9:41 ` Bennet Gallein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: CFS @ 2022-11-20 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pve-user Hey guys I am Proxmox v7.2.11(I think). I can't get logged in all of the sudden the last 2 days with a password I have been logging in with for over 1 year now. Yesterday I wanted to delete 2 VMs and rebuild them I went to login and nothing: I am however able to login to the server with ssh via root and the password for root. YEs I can manage it via cli but the whole reason I install Proxmox was to use the GUI. Please can someone point me in the right direction I have been searching for 2 days now literally off and on for hours. Thanks guys, -- *Michael Cooper* Linux Certified Docker/Kubernetes Professional Raspberry Pi Enthusiast RPi Hobby Blog <”https://www.coopfire.com”> From alfiomunoz@gmail.com Sun Nov 20 10:41:30 2022 Return-Path: <alfiomunoz@gmail.com> X-Original-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Delivered-To: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (firstgate.proxmox.com [212.224.123.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.proxmox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57500A026 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:41:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from firstgate.proxmox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 051BD21735 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by firstgate.proxmox.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 10:40:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id s18so4688757qvo.9 for <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 01:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jXzCAERWKMNvJiwPRbeI4MAHI6DJJBOVxXJ1InxeyLU=; b=C99CWkEN6ppdkRa4rBWq85SeVue5N3SqAJwAIjxCicHIz+3fsgaVeOLgpmsRn/btl0 v9TK0nmKLbbe2OyxEFeE8xUdN+b71opsxo/4bX5+BF7ezXsMdUGt+sBxBhTgpnioKhOg ZW68zOfEtC4kmsm+uNftvWqRTMrcL+9myU1BxqBr28Pe3CIwi8EZiYTpEoQR/SNbTxCg 2SHT2Zs0qXskZ6bGN2wno1T2MM5+0yKKrux1YHezuZMasR1gYO1CwJcCRk5Mvo8DLbZl IiQgXfHR/8SDN7+KhcIsiLmeqa0WjupbP2TAVIgvUe0F6ysjl0MnKs+Oo1WGfRrMHYJO 0KPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jXzCAERWKMNvJiwPRbeI4MAHI6DJJBOVxXJ1InxeyLU=; b=eiqSpb2IHOO6JyG53baNw+SUIm9li3iOdP+3SpHbbLJx2ZzRpKMvlIB0l9J+24yUvU fXtGiV/Fjf4cQrQsV9ulL3P76wGc1TK5EjKAZA/G8Xgx5qvc2/hLY9L9kWXJh2s5nK8F Xhzw6DsfQUw6FuzHVR5X3PB55PJr+JAOaB9oYOLfKRzxBH+MzuI0Yj2IcwZ90vluY+vl pEFjGusqapkm0vMeBcAlQHu9hh70fd7rUQNmLcR3BdED7fCacQsAbbKWqjl9k9aXSA+j 8URsrk6o0pxJWQ4/eQGkbJ173X9FEmODGH4X5FwA6yBz+Q6x7nwW3zWKSL+TukvXKnCS ZjBQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pkWdkMHkQ6HwoleqUmWpF2TBG5rKkEzcyY8A8xZWrF8yWsUBmPp tai7GDwoq+hqCINu79zCal2hCywJR0PZvRok8A9AXV+g X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6CSkKgINzSnPUD3yRw6g7Wamrh1yw+IU9mkVO3W+vi4HPgdyx6Kr/qabcP002/F5cfp7dvPaMN7+gGH4JKv5c= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:584d:b0:4c6:5a5f:3063 with SMTP id ml13-20020a056214584d00b004c65a5f3063mr13420853qvb.4.1668937249456; Sun, 20 Nov 2022 01:40:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8678ddf7-98ef-f87b-bb16-09ad4953804e@suma-informatika.hr> <20190708201918.00ca0f22@rosa.proxmox.com> <649afeba-9626-6688-7967-3ee604eea2bb@suma-informatika.hr> <ce32bc10-50c5-6d45-ad71-39d3e259ccb0@suma-informatika.hr> <000c2ab6-ea94-1979-57af-c2f20ba47e2a@suma-informatika.hr> <0faa5905-9eec-3ecd-4a66-a6fbeb089525@dhzm.nl> <e3e5ec83-369c-8583-f463-3c5518b9138b@suma-informatika.hr> <260b988a-ec7f-0696-d079-0bb54f05ecf1@coopfire.com> In-Reply-To: <260b988a-ec7f-0696-d079-0bb54f05ecf1@coopfire.com> From: Alfio munoz <alfiomunoz@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 05:40:38 -0400 Message-ID: <CACRHWWeD1Ng7oh3bVB6CB-j7gatTohxsHsFH9oW821zCNgZ=Ag@mail.gmail.com> To: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> X-SPAM-LEVEL: Spam detection results: 0 BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain DKIM_VALID_EF -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain FREEMAIL_FROM 0.001 Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message POISEN_SPAM_PILL_4 0.1 random spam to be learned in bayes RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE -0.0001 Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust SPF_HELO_NONE 0.001 SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record SPF_PASS -0.001 SPF: sender matches SPF record Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [PVE-User] password failure X-BeenThere: pve-user@lists.proxmox.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Proxmox VE user list <pve-user.lists.proxmox.com> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/options/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-user/> List-Post: <mailto:pve-user@lists.proxmox.com> List-Help: <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user>, <mailto:pve-user-request@lists.proxmox.com?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2022 09:41:30 -0000 Hi, did You check the login environment, when You login your proxmox by gui check that You are in Linux pam, because You have proxmox ve authentication and Linux pam. El dom, 20 de nov de 2022, 5:37 a. m., CFS <mcooper@coopfire.com> escribi= =C3=B3: > Hey guys I am Proxmox v7.2.11(I think). I can't get logged in all of the > sudden the last 2 days with a password I have been logging in with for > over 1 year now. Yesterday I wanted to delete 2 VMs and rebuild them I > went to login and nothing: > > I am however able to login to the server with ssh via root and the > password for root. YEs I can manage it via cli but the whole reason I > install Proxmox was to use the GUI. Please can someone point me in the > right direction I have been searching for 2 days now literally off and > on for hours. > > Thanks guys, > -- > *Michael Cooper* > Linux Certified > Docker/Kubernetes Professional > Raspberry Pi Enthusiast > RPi Hobby Blog <=E2=80=9Dhttps://www.coopfire.com=E2=80=9D> > _______________________________________________ > pve-user mailing list > pve-user@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] password failure 2022-11-20 9:36 ` [PVE-User] password failure CFS @ 2022-11-20 9:41 ` Bennet Gallein 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Bennet Gallein @ 2022-11-20 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: pve-user Hey, I sometimes forget to select the "Linux PAM standard authentication" realm on the login-screen so the Proxmox VE authentication server is selected. Maybe that's your issue? Otherwise you can always tail journalctl to see if any errors appear there. Best Regards, Bennet On 20.11.22 10:36, CFS wrote: > Hey guys I am Proxmox v7.2.11(I think). I can't get logged in all of > the sudden the last 2 days with a password I have been logging in with > for over 1 year now. Yesterday I wanted to delete 2 VMs and rebuild > them I went to login and nothing: > > I am however able to login to the server with ssh via root and the > password for root. YEs I can manage it via cli but the whole reason I > install Proxmox was to use the GUI. Please can someone point me in the > right direction I have been searching for 2 days now literally off and > on for hours. > > Thanks guys, -- Bennet Gallein https://bennetgallein.de Elbinger Str. 18, 21339 Lueneburg, Germany USt-IdNr.: DE320525917 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4854e27d-8820-46fb-bca7-8c10f3413969@suma-informatika.hr>]
* Re: [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality [not found] ` <4854e27d-8820-46fb-bca7-8c10f3413969@suma-informatika.hr> @ 2024-05-01 20:54 ` Mark Schouten via pve-user 2024-05-01 20:54 ` Mark Schouten via pve-user 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mark Schouten via pve-user @ 2024-05-01 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Proxmox VE user list, PVE User List; +Cc: Mark Schouten [-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5529 bytes --] From: "Mark Schouten" <mark@tuxis.nl> To: "Proxmox VE user list" <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, "PVE User List" <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 20:54:24 +0000 Message-ID: <em65b22363-a51f-4931-9246-737ef8c1acf1@9b0b2e4d.com> Hi, You need three nodes for a cluster. With two nodes, and a reboot of one of the two, the remaining node has no quorum and will do nothing. Best solution is to get a third node, or external vote support : https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#_corosync_external_vote_support Also, check the shutdown policy: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#ha_manager_shutdown_policy Good luck! — Mark Schouten CTO, Tuxis B.V. +31 318 200208 / mark@tuxis.nl ------ Original Message ------ From "Tonči Stipičević" <tonci@suma-informatika.hr> To "PVE User List" <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> Date 01/05/2024, 22:36:49 Subject [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality >Hello to all, > >I've installed PVE cluster (ver 8.2.2) , two nodes : pve01 / pve02 put in HA group G1 > >Every VM has "started" state .. When i.e. PVE02 node restarts , it's VMs are not being migrated to PVE01 node, but they get in "freeze" state in stead of being (online) migrated to PVE01 node ... Syslog messages are "shutting down" > > .... VMs are started again just after PVE02 node boots up ... So , real downtime can be experienced > >Otherwise , manual online migration works correctly (zfs storage replication) > > Could somebody check this ? > >Thank you very much in advance > >BR > > >Tonci > >srdačan pozdrav / best regards > >Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. >direktor / manager > >SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 > >Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke >Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management > >mob: 091 1234003 >www.suma-informatika.hr > > > >_______________________________________________ >pve-user mailing list >pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --] _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality [not found] ` <4854e27d-8820-46fb-bca7-8c10f3413969@suma-informatika.hr> 2024-05-01 20:54 ` [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality Mark Schouten via pve-user @ 2024-05-01 20:54 ` Mark Schouten via pve-user 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Mark Schouten via pve-user @ 2024-05-01 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Proxmox VE user list, PVE User List; +Cc: Mark Schouten [-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 5756 bytes --] From: "Mark Schouten" <mark@tuxis.nl> To: "Proxmox VE user list" <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>, "PVE User List" <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> Subject: Re: [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 20:54:24 +0000 Message-ID: <em65b22363-a51f-4931-9246-737ef8c1acf1@9b0b2e4d.com> Hi, You need three nodes for a cluster. With two nodes, and a reboot of one of the two, the remaining node has no quorum and will do nothing. Best solution is to get a third node, or external vote support : https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#_corosync_external_vote_support Also, check the shutdown policy: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/pve-admin-guide.html#ha_manager_shutdown_policy Good luck! — Mark Schouten CTO, Tuxis B.V. +31 318 200208 / mark@tuxis.nl ------ Original Message ------ From "Tonči Stipičević" <tonci@suma-informatika.hr> To "PVE User List" <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com> Date 01/05/2024, 22:36:49 Subject [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality >Hello to all, > >I've installed PVE cluster (ver 8.2.2) , two nodes : pve01 / pve02 put in HA group G1 > >Every VM has "started" state .. When i.e. PVE02 node restarts , it's VMs are not being migrated to PVE01 node, but they get in "freeze" state in stead of being (online) migrated to PVE01 node ... Syslog messages are "shutting down" > > .... VMs are started again just after PVE02 node boots up ... So , real downtime can be experienced > >Otherwise , manual online migration works correctly (zfs storage replication) > > Could somebody check this ? > >Thank you very much in advance > >BR > > >Tonci > >srdačan pozdrav / best regards > >Tonči Stipičević, dipl. ing. elektr. >direktor / manager > >SUMA Informatika d.o.o., Badalićeva 27, OIB 93926415263 > >Podrška / Upravljanje IT sustavima za male i srednje tvrtke >Small & Medium Business IT Support / Management > >mob: 091 1234003 >www.suma-informatika.hr > > > >_______________________________________________ >pve-user mailing list >pve-user@lists.proxmox.com >https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 157 bytes --] _______________________________________________ pve-user mailing list pve-user@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-01 21:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <8678ddf7-98ef-f87b-bb16-09ad4953804e@suma-informatika.hr>
[not found] ` <20190708201918.00ca0f22@rosa.proxmox.com>
[not found] ` <649afeba-9626-6688-7967-3ee604eea2bb@suma-informatika.hr>
2022-08-17 5:39 ` [PVE-User] Shared SAN <> ZFS concept Tonči Stipičević
[not found] ` <mailman.66.1660809003.345.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2022-08-23 14:30 ` Kyle Schmitt
[not found] ` <000c2ab6-ea94-1979-57af-c2f20ba47e2a@suma-informatika.hr>
[not found] ` <0faa5905-9eec-3ecd-4a66-a6fbeb089525@dhzm.nl>
2022-11-19 7:44 ` [PVE-User] PVE 7.2.-14 LXC boot problem Tonči Stipičević
2022-11-20 9:36 ` [PVE-User] password failure CFS
2022-11-20 9:41 ` Bennet Gallein
[not found] ` <4854e27d-8820-46fb-bca7-8c10f3413969@suma-informatika.hr>
2024-05-01 20:54 ` [PVE-User] 8.2.2 - limited cluster functionality Mark Schouten via pve-user
2024-05-01 20:54 ` Mark Schouten via pve-user
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox