* [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched...
@ 2021-07-14 16:19 Marco Gaiarin
2021-07-15 5:57 ` Naumann, Thomas
[not found] ` <mailman.448.1626290622.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Gaiarin @ 2021-07-14 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-user
I'm a bit (ab)used to different switches brand, mostly HP/Aruba, but
now i've o work on cisco catalyst ones.
But i've a trouble...
I've to manage some little clusters of two servers, where the second
server is a little/backup one; primary server have a two gigabit link
bond, spare server only one link.
But for a sake of symmetry and mental health, i've defined in switches
two bond/trunk, and i was supposing that, as in HP, i can simply connect
only one port of the trunk.
But port led never get green, keep in amber color...
Catalyst side:
interface range GigabitEthernet1/0/14, GigabitEthernet2/0/14
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 9 mode active
exit
interface port-channel 9
description Trunk LAN Server 2
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,90,99
exit
and PVE side:
auto vmbr0
iface vmbr0 inet static
address 10.15.5.21/21
gateway 10.15.0.1
bridge-ports eno1
bridge-stp off
bridge-fd 0
bridge-vlan-aware yes
bridge-vids 2-4094
With this configuration, if i connect 'eno1' cable to port 14 (switch1
or switch2, it is the same), switch port led never get 'green'.
What i'm missing? Thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797
Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched...
2021-07-14 16:19 [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched Marco Gaiarin
@ 2021-07-15 5:57 ` Naumann, Thomas
[not found] ` <mailman.448.1626290622.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naumann, Thomas @ 2021-07-15 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-user
Hi,
our working config with cisco nexus switches:
cisco side:
interface port-channelxxx
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan xxx
flowcontrol receive on
flowcontrol send on
proxmox side:
auto bond1
iface bond1 inet manual
up ip link set $IFACE up
bond-slaves xxx xxx
bond-mode 802.3ad
bond-miimon 100
bond-lacp-rate 1
bond-xmit-hash-policy layer2+3
bond-min-links 1
best regards
--
Thomas Naumann
Abteilung Netze und Kommunikation
Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg
Universitätsrechenzentrum
Universitätsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg
fon: +49 391 67-58563
email: thomas.naumann@ovgu.de
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 18:19 +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> I'm a bit (ab)used to different switches brand, mostly HP/Aruba, but
> now i've o work on cisco catalyst ones.
>
> But i've a trouble...
>
>
> I've to manage some little clusters of two servers, where the second
> server is a little/backup one; primary server have a two gigabit link
> bond, spare server only one link.
>
> But for a sake of symmetry and mental health, i've defined in
> switches
> two bond/trunk, and i was supposing that, as in HP, i can simply
> connect
> only one port of the trunk.
>
> But port led never get green, keep in amber color...
>
>
> Catalyst side:
>
> interface range GigabitEthernet1/0/14, GigabitEthernet2/0/14
> switchport mode trunk
> channel-group 9 mode active
> exit
> interface port-channel 9
> description Trunk LAN Server 2
> switchport mode trunk
> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,90,99
> exit
>
> and PVE side:
>
> auto vmbr0
> iface vmbr0 inet static
> address 10.15.5.21/21
> gateway 10.15.0.1
> bridge-ports eno1
> bridge-stp off
> bridge-fd 0
> bridge-vlan-aware yes
> bridge-vids 2-4094
>
> With this configuration, if i connect 'eno1' cable to port 14
> (switch1
> or switch2, it is the same), switch port led never get 'green'.
>
>
> What i'm missing? Thanks.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <mailman.448.1626290622.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>]
* Re: [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched...
[not found] ` <mailman.448.1626290622.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
@ 2021-07-15 10:29 ` Marco Gaiarin
2021-07-15 11:23 ` Naumann, Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marco Gaiarin @ 2021-07-15 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-user
Mandi! Daniel via pve-user
In chel di` si favelave...
> check the Cisco log "sh logg" when the LED stays orange it could be an STP problem.
OK. I will try next week.
> Why you didn’t configure it as a port-channel interface? (bond on Linux)
...because i have only one NIC. ;-)
You (and Thomas, too, thanks!) are meaning that i need anyway to create
an LACP bond with only one member to talk to an LACP cisco trunk?
With HP (and Ubiquity, also) it is not needed!
Thanks.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/
Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7 - 33078 - San Vito al Tagliamento (PN)
marco.gaiarin(at)lanostrafamiglia.it t +39-0434-842711 f +39-0434-842797
Dona il 5 PER MILLE a LA NOSTRA FAMIGLIA!
http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/index.php/it/sostienici/5x1000
(cf 00307430132, categoria ONLUS oppure RICERCA SANITARIA)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched...
2021-07-15 10:29 ` Marco Gaiarin
@ 2021-07-15 11:23 ` Naumann, Thomas
[not found] ` <mailman.488.1626380936.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Naumann, Thomas @ 2021-07-15 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-user
Hi,
LACP is not a "must have", you need it if you want to have physical HA.
If there is only one physical interface on proxmox node then you can
configure one switchport on cisco side as acces/trunk-port - for
example:
proxmox side:
auto vmbrxxx
iface vmbrxxx inet static
address xxx
gateway xxx
bridge_ports xxx
bridge_stp on
bridge_fd 3
cisco side:
interface GigabitEthernetxxx
description xxx
switchport
switchport access vlan xxx
switchport mode access
no vtp
spanning-tree portfast edge
spanning-tree guard root
best regards
--
Thomas Naumann
Abteilung Netze und Kommunikation
Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg
Universitätsrechenzentrum
Universitätsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg
fon: +49 391 67-58563
email: thomas.naumann@ovgu.de
On Thu, 2021-07-15 at 12:29 +0200, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Mandi! Daniel via pve-user
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
> > check the Cisco log "sh logg" when the LED stays orange it could be
> > an STP problem.
>
> OK. I will try next week.
>
>
> > Why you didn’t configure it as a port-channel interface? (bond on
> > Linux)
>
> ...because i have only one NIC. ;-)
>
> You (and Thomas, too, thanks!) are meaning that i need anyway to
> create
> an LACP bond with only one member to talk to an LACP cisco trunk?
>
> With HP (and Ubiquity, also) it is not needed!
>
>
> Thanks.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-16 9:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-14 16:19 [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switched Marco Gaiarin
2021-07-15 5:57 ` Naumann, Thomas
[not found] ` <mailman.448.1626290622.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2021-07-15 10:29 ` Marco Gaiarin
2021-07-15 11:23 ` Naumann, Thomas
[not found] ` <mailman.488.1626380936.464.pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
2021-07-16 9:55 ` [PVE-User] PVE and Cisco Catalyst switches Marco Gaiarin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox