From: Maxime AUGER <m.auger@auranext.com>
To: "'pve-user@lists.proxmox.com'" <pve-user@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: [PVE-User] bad ZFS performance with proxmox 6.2
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:12:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201006111213.9D6441764081@mailhost.auranext.com> (raw)
Hello,
We notice a significant difference in ZFS performances between proxmox 5.3-5 and proxmox 6.2.
Last year when we tested proxmox5.3 on the HPE-DL360Gen9 hardware.
This hardware is provided with 8 ssd disks (2x 200-GB OS dedicated mdadm RAID0 and 6x 1-TB ZFS pool for VMs storage)
On ZFS pool we measured the peak value at 2.8GB/s (write)
Actually on promox6 we measured the peak value at 1.5GB/s (write).
One server, ITXPVE03 was running Initially on proxmox 5.3-5.
peak performance 2.8GB/s
Recently it has been reinstalled on proxmox 6.2 (from iso)
peak performance 1.5GB/s
to confirm this observation we have extended the checks to the 4 servers, identical hardware and low level software, BIOS and firmwares versions)
The measurements confirm the statement
All tests are done in serveurs idle state conditions with zero ative workload, all VMs/Containers shutdown.
ZFS configuration are identical, no compression, no deduplicatation
root@CLIPVE03(PVE6.2):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.851028 s, 1.2 GB/s
root@ITXPV03(PVE6.2):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.722055 s, 1.5 GB/s
root@CLIB05PVE02(PVE5.3-5):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.397212 s, 2.6 GB/s
root@CLIB05PVE01(PVE5.3-5):~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/zfsraid10/iotest bs=1M count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.39394 s, 2.7 GB/s
At the ZFS level we can notice a difference in the version of zfsutils-linux
0.7.X on PVE5.3-5 (0.7.12)
0.8.X on PVE6.2 (same measure on 0.8.3 and 0.8.4)
has anyone experienced this problem ?
Maxime AUGER
Network Team Leader
AURANEXT
next reply other threads:[~2020-10-06 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 11:12 Maxime AUGER [this message]
2020-10-06 14:54 ` Roland
2020-10-06 15:59 ` Uwe Sauter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201006111213.9D6441764081@mailhost.auranext.com \
--to=m.auger@auranext.com \
--cc=pve-user@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox