public inbox for pve-user@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Berteaud <daniel@firewall-services.com>
To: pve-user <pve-user@pve.proxmox.com>
Subject: [PVE-User] PBS : is dirty-bitmap really accurate ?
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 18:40:34 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110267368.76036.1595436034847.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr> (raw)

Hi 

I've started playing with PBS on some VM. So far, it's looking really promizing. 
There's one strange thing though : the percent of the dirty data. For example, I backup one VM every 2 or 3 days. It's a moderately busy server, mainly serving a MariaDB database (zabbix server + mariadb). On each backup, I get similar dirty values : 

INFO: using fast incremental mode (dirty-bitmap), 492.7 GiB dirty of 590.0 GiB total 

While I'm sur not even 10% of this has really been written. 

Get more or less the same problem on other VM. One which I know just sleep all day (my personnal OnlyOffice document server), and which I backup daily, and get values like : 

INFO: using fast incremental mode (dirty-bitmap), 5.0 GiB dirty of 10.0 GiB total 

Or another small one (personnal samba DC controler) : 

INFO: using fast incremental mode (dirty-bitmap), 13.0 GiB dirty of 20.0 GiB total 

The only write activity for those 2 are just a few KB or maybe MB of log lines. Respectivly 5 and 13GB of dirty blocks seems unreal. 

Am I the only one seeing this ? Could the dirty-bitmap mark dirty blocks without write activity somehow ? 

Regards, 
Daniel 

-- 


[ https://www.firewall-services.com/ ] 	
Daniel Berteaud 
FIREWALL-SERVICES SAS, La sécurité des réseaux 
Société de Services en Logiciels Libres 
Tél : +33.5 56 64 15 32 
Matrix: @dani:fws.fr 
[ https://www.firewall-services.com/ | https://www.firewall-services.com ] 


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-22 16:40 Daniel Berteaud [this message]
2020-07-23  6:43 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2020-07-23  6:53   ` Daniel Berteaud
2020-07-23  9:00     ` Jorge Boncompte
2020-07-23  9:34       ` Fabian Grünbichler
2020-07-23  9:40         ` Daniel Berteaud
2020-07-23 21:59     ` Roland
2020-07-24  7:02       ` Daniel Berteaud
2020-07-24  7:54         ` Ronny Aasen
2020-07-26  9:24           ` Mark Schouten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110267368.76036.1595436034847.JavaMail.zimbra@fws.fr \
    --to=daniel@firewall-services.com \
    --cc=pve-user@pve.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal