public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
To: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH network] sdn: factor out frr config generation and writing
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:09:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xnmnu4jaztd2eroz7edyx36z3rjbpz75irzhwwkwixrexwqmc5@vyffklel42dp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ebe83020-28b3-4e02-a3d1-4de9e76ebf8e@proxmox.com>

On 12.02.2025 12:17, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
>This still has some issues (see below), maybe we can look at it together
>next week (will be gone after today) and see if we can make some
>additional structural improvements to the whole controller / frr logic?

>There were also some regressions/bugs with FRR config generation while
>testing, so this series needs some work still.

We checked this together offliste, the patch doesn't change the output,
so no regressions.

>On 2/5/25 17:13, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers.pm b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers.pm
>> index fd7ad54ac38c..43f154b7338e 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers.pm
>> @@ -148,10 +149,22 @@ sub reload_controller {
>>
>>      return if !$controller_cfg;
>>
>> +    my $frr_reload = 0;
>> +
>>      foreach my $id (keys %{$controller_cfg->{ids}}) {
>>  	my $plugin_config = $controller_cfg->{ids}->{$id};
>> -	my $plugin = PVE::Network::SDN::Controllers::Plugin->lookup($plugin_config->{type});
>> -	$plugin->reload_controller();
>> +	my $type = $plugin_config->{type};
>> +	my @frr_types = ("bgp", "isis", "evpn");
>> +	if (grep {$type} @frr_types) {
>
>this doesn't work. you need:
>
>  grep {$_ eq $type} @frr_types
>
>(or what thomas said is even better - just for future reference)

Yup, my bad, will fix this.

>> +	    $frr_reload = 1;
>> +	} else {
>> +	    my $plugin = PVE::Network::SDN::Controllers::Plugin->lookup($type);
>> +	    $plugin->reload_controller();
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ($frr_reload) {
>> +	PVE::Network::SDN::Controllers::Frr::reload_controller();
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -161,12 +174,22 @@ sub generate_controller_rawconfig {
>
>This actually never gets called (except in the tests, ..). It works, but
>still takes the old code path without going through the new FRR helper.
>Probably not the intention?

Yep, this function is only really called in the unit tests. With the
usual flow, we call write_controller_config, which resolves the plugin
and calls this function on the each plugin.

We could call the generate_controller_rawconfig function here though:
src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers.pm:212. So instead of getting the plugin
and calling the rawconfig implementations in write_controller_config,
just use this function.

>>      my $cfg = PVE::Network::SDN::running_config();
>>      my $controller_cfg = $cfg->{controllers};
>>      return if !$controller_cfg;
>> +    my $frr_generate = 0;
>>
>>      my $rawconfig = "";
>>      foreach my $id (keys %{$controller_cfg->{ids}}) {
>>  	my $plugin_config = $controller_cfg->{ids}->{$id};
>> -	my $plugin = PVE::Network::SDN::Controllers::Plugin->lookup($plugin_config->{type});
>> -	$rawconfig .= $plugin->generate_controller_rawconfig($plugin_config, $config);
>> +	my $type = $plugin_config->{type};
>> +	my @frr_types = ("bgp", "isis", "evpn");
>> +	if (grep {$type} @frr_types) {

>> @@ -323,6 +323,21 @@ sub vnet_update_hook {
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>> +sub reload_controller {
>> +    my ($class) = @_;
>> +    die "implemented in the Frr helper";
>> +}
>> +
>> +sub generate_controller_rawconfig {
>> +    my ($class, $config) = @_;
>> +    die "implemented in the Frr helper";
>> +}
>> +
>> +sub write_controller_config {
>> +    my ($class, $config) = @_;
>> +    die "implemented in the Frr helper";
>> +}
>> +
>>  1;
>
>Those methods are only needed in the Controllers, not Zones - they serve
>no purpose here afaict?

Yep, true, didn't check the directory I was in (zone vs controller) :)

Thanks for the review!


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


      reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 10:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 16:13 Gabriel Goller
2025-02-11 20:30 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-02-12  8:45   ` Stefan Hanreich
2025-02-12 11:17 ` Stefan Hanreich
2025-02-13 10:09   ` Gabriel Goller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xnmnu4jaztd2eroz7edyx36z3rjbpz75irzhwwkwixrexwqmc5@vyffklel42dp \
    --to=g.goller@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal