From: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH pve-cluster 2/2] api: cluster config: create new clusters with lower token coefficient
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:44:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s8o7bsbo7yp.fsf@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33fcd2fb-48b2-44a2-9e34-e1511d6101de@proxmox.com> (Thomas Lamprecht's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2026 20:36:54 +0100")
Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com> writes:
> Am 16.02.26 um 17:00 schrieb Maximiliano Sandoval:
>>> + 'token-coefficient' => {
>>> + type => 'integer',
>>> + description => "Token coefficient to set in the corosync configuration.",
>>> + default => 125,
>>> + minimum => 0,
>>>From man 5 corosync.conf's token_coefficient documentation: "This value
>> can be set to 0 resulting in effective removal of this feature.". If we
>> want to expose setting this to 0 I would document that it has a special
>> meaning and what does this entail. I would personally feel more
>> comfortable setting `minimum => 1` for now instead.
>
> At least a "see `man 5 corosync.conf` for details might be nice, adding some
> extra hints here, like how it's roughly used and special values, could be
> indeed nice too; some of that might be better off in the docs or the
> verbose_descriptions property though.
>
> But I'm not so sure about the actual value to the user of restricting this
> here? I mean, if we ever would expose this in the UI in some advanced section
> then one could show clear hints for such special/odd values and their potential
> implications, for the CLI that's mostly the job of the docs and maybe an extra
> informal "log" print, but forcing a user editing the corosync.conf manually in
> case they want to try this, whyever that might be, seems to rather worsen UX not
> improve it.
>From corosync.conf(5) I wrongly got the feeling that `0` had some
special-casing going on, but it actually does not. The docs just say in
a somewhat verbose fashion that multiplying with zero generally results
in zero.
We discussed this off-list a bit and my suggestion in my other reply,
namely:
"Coefficient used to determine Corosync's token timeout. See the
corosync.conf(5) manual for more details."
is OK.
--
Maximiliano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-17 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 11:57 [PATCH cluster/docs 0/3] create new corosync " Friedrich Weber
2026-02-12 11:57 ` [PATCH pve-cluster 1/2] corosync: create config: allow setting " Friedrich Weber
2026-02-12 11:57 ` [PATCH pve-cluster 2/2] api: cluster config: create new clusters with lower " Friedrich Weber
2026-02-16 16:00 ` Maximiliano Sandoval
2026-02-16 19:36 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2026-02-17 12:44 ` Maximiliano Sandoval [this message]
2026-02-17 12:50 ` Friedrich Weber
2026-02-16 16:09 ` Maximiliano Sandoval
2026-02-12 11:57 ` [PATCH pve-docs 1/1] pvecm: config: document how to change the " Friedrich Weber
2026-02-13 10:12 ` Friedrich Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s8o7bsbo7yp.fsf@proxmox.com \
--to=m.sandoval@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox