From: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
To: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
Cc: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: [pve-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-firewall v2 1/2] fix: firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` to all chains
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:16:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <r3ueppeiqcwxy4zlhrofvwpvpsf5rphfhyqnnjc6f74habfve3@2hlzozjsmln3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312132025.7499-1-h.laimer@proxmox.com>
applied and s/nt_/nf_/ (except where referencing existing commit, to not
mess up copy&paste sesarches)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 02:20:24PM +0100, Hannes Laimer wrote:
> ... on the guest table. There is no reason to not repect that option
> on those two chains. These two were missed in the referenced commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Laimer <h.laimer@proxmox.com>
> Fixes: 64dc344b ("firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` option to guest table")
> Tested-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
> no changes since v1, so I kept @Stefans T-b and R-b
>
> proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> index 2dd7c48..30f7b4f 100644
> --- a/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> +++ b/proxmox-firewall/resources/proxmox-firewall.nft
> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
> }
>
> chain pre-vm-out {
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain vm-out {
> @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ table bridge proxmox-firewall-guests {
>
> chain before-bridge {
> meta protocol arp accept
> - meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : drop }
> + meta protocol != arp ct state vmap { established : accept, related : accept, invalid : jump invalid-conntrack }
> }
>
> chain forward {
> --
> 2.39.5
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 13:20 [pve-devel] " Hannes Laimer
2025-03-12 13:20 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-firewall v2 2/2] firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` option to host table Hannes Laimer
2025-03-13 12:43 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH proxmox-firewall v2 1/2] fix: firewall: apply `nt_conntrack_allow_invalid` to all chains Stefan Hanreich
2025-03-13 16:16 ` Wolfgang Bumiller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=r3ueppeiqcwxy4zlhrofvwpvpsf5rphfhyqnnjc6f74habfve3@2hlzozjsmln3 \
--to=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
--cc=h.laimer@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal