public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
To: "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH frr 0/2] Bump FRR to 10.4.1
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:53:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.73.1764089597.399.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121141446.349501-1-g.goller@proxmox.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 15823 bytes --]

From: "DERUMIER, Alexandre" <alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com>
To: "pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH frr 0/2] Bump FRR to 10.4.1
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 16:53:06 +0000
Message-ID: <303fec039b8faa7ae3b78e3872e142e4ff304dcb.camel@groupe-cyllene.com>

Hi, 

10.4.2 has been released last week.


be carefull with frr updates, from my experience they are always to a
lot of bugs && regression when new major version is release,
and sometime it take weeks to triggers specific bugs in production.
(and even more to debug)

and frr still maintain 10.2 branch for example (10.2.5).


Personnaly, for my pve9 production, I'll pin my frr version to 10.2,
because I don't have time to retest new version each 6 months.



-------- Message initial --------
De: Gabriel Goller <g.goller@proxmox.com>
Répondre à: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-
devel@lists.proxmox.com>
À: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Objet: [pve-devel] [PATCH frr 0/2] Bump FRR to 10.4.1
Date: 21/11/2025 15:13:21

Bump FRR to 10.4.1, we do this for two reasons:
 * we can drop two patches, which have been merged upstream
 * fix the libyang errors in the journal
 * try to update a bit more frequently (maybe always one minor version
behind
   upstream would be nice), so that we can avoid the fallout of
updating two
   major versions (8->10) again.

Went through the changelog quite thoroughly, didn't find anything that
could
cause an issue. Tested it on a few clusters I had lying around (ospf,
fabricd(ip4 and ip6), bgp+evpn) and didn't notice anything off. Stefan
said
he'd test on his clusters next week as well. Would be nice if we get it
in
early so that we have a nice long testing period.

frr:

Gabriel Goller (2):
  bump frr to 10.4.1, remove obsolete patches
  d/changelog: bump package version

 debian/changelog                              |   6 +
 ...ummy_as_loopback-option-per-default.patch} |   0
 ...A_IF_DUMMY-flag-for-dummy-interfaces.patch | 125 -----------
 ...on-to-treat-dummy-interfaces-as-loop.patch | 206 ------------------
 ...dd-dependancy-to-networking.service.patch} |   0
 ...-starting-order-for-debian-packages.patch} |   0
 debian/patches/series                         |   8 +-
 frr                                           |   2 +-
 8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 337 deletions(-)
 rename debian/patches/pve/{0006-fabricd-enable-dummy_as_loopback-
option-per-default.patch => 0004-fabricd-enable-dummy_as_loopback-
option-per-default.patch} (100%)
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/pve/0004-zebra-add-ZEBRA_IF_DUMMY-
flag-for-dummy-interfaces.patch
 delete mode 100644 debian/patches/pve/0005-fabricd-add-option-to-
treat-dummy-interfaces-as-loop.patch
 rename debian/patches/pve/{0007-systemd-add-dependancy-to-
networking.service.patch => 0005-systemd-add-dependancy-to-
networking.service.patch} (100%)
 rename debian/patches/pve/{0007-tools-fix-daemon-starting-order-for-
debian-packages.patch => 0006-tools-fix-daemon-starting-order-for-
debian-packages.patch} (100%)


Summary over all repositories:
  8 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 337 deletions(-)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-25 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 14:13 Gabriel Goller
2025-11-21 14:13 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH frr 1/2] bump frr to 10.4.1, remove obsolete patches Gabriel Goller
2025-11-21 14:13 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH frr 2/2] d/changelog: bump package version Gabriel Goller
2025-11-25 16:53 ` DERUMIER, Alexandre via pve-devel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mailman.73.1764089597.399.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --to=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=alexandre.derumier@groupe-cyllene.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal