From: Ivaylo Markov via pve-devel <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Cc: Ivaylo Markov <ivaylo.markov@storpool.com>, nikolay.angelov@storpool.com
Subject: [pve-devel] StorPool storage plugin concerns
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:44:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.20.1738673089.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 6566 bytes --]
From: Ivaylo Markov <ivaylo.markov@storpool.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Cc: nikolay.angelov@storpool.com
Subject: StorPool storage plugin concerns
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:44:09 +0200
Message-ID: <26d735ba-da13-4501-8eae-f7e978410c8a@storpool.com>
Greetings,
I was pointed here to discuss the StorPool storage plugin[0] with the
dev team.
If I understand correctly, there is a concern with the our HA watchdog
daemon, and I'd like to explain the why and how.
As a distributed storage system, StorPool has its own internal
clustering mechanisms; it can run
on networks that are independent from the PVE cluster one, and thus
remain unaffected by network
partitions or other problems that would cause the standard PVE watchdog
to reboot a node.
In the case of HCI (compute + storage) nodes, this reboot can interrupt
the normal operation of the
StorPool cluster, causing reduced performance or downtime, which could
be avoided if the host is not restarted.
This is why we do our best to avoid such behavior across the different
cloud management platforms.
Currently, when our daemon detects an unexpected exit of a resource
manager, it will SIGKILL PVE
HA services and running VMs on the node, which should prevent 2
instances of the same VM running at
the same time. PVE services and our block storage client daemon are
restarted as well.
We're open to discussion and suggestions for our approach and
implementation.
[0] https://github.com/storpool/pve-storpool
--
Ivaylo Markov
Quality & Automation Engineer
StorPool Storage
https://www.storpool.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 12:44 Ivaylo Markov via pve-devel [this message]
2025-02-04 14:46 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-02-13 15:21 ` Ivaylo Markov via pve-devel
[not found] ` <dea47906-dd09-40c1-8e28-386d38643a4d@storpool.com>
2025-02-14 11:42 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-02-18 11:34 ` Ivaylo Markov via pve-devel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-04 12:43 Ivaylo Markov via pve-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mailman.20.1738673089.293.pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--to=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=ivaylo.markov@storpool.com \
--cc=nikolay.angelov@storpool.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal