public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Lauterer <a.lauterer@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	"Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v2 2/3] disks: die if storage name is already in use
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:22:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff083011-f422-1d93-d9d5-f667300e03e5@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1660736115.7grkvr18dc.astroid@nora.none>



On 8/17/22 13:42, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On July 15, 2022 1:58 pm, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
[...]
>> -	my $worker = sub {
>> -	    my $path = "/mnt/pve/$name";
>> -	    my $mountunitname = PVE::Systemd::escape_unit($path, 1) . ".mount";
>> -	    my $mountunitpath = "/etc/systemd/system/$mountunitname";
>> +	my $mounted = PVE::Diskmanage::mounted_paths();
>> +	die "a mountpoint for '${name}' already exists: ${path} ($1)\n" if $mounted->{$path};
> 
> nit: the mountpoint existing is not the issue (something already being
> mounted there is!). also, where does the $1 come from?

good point and thanks for catching the $1
> 
>> +	die "a systemd mount unit already exists: ${mountunitpath}\n" if -e $mountunitpath;
> 
> could check if it's identical to the one we'd generate (in the spirit of
> patch #3 ;))

I looked into it, depending on how hard we want to match the mount unit, this 
could be a bit hard. It contains the /dev/disk/by-uuid/... path which will not 
be the same as it changes with each FS creation (IIUC).

> 
>>   
>> +	my $worker = sub {
>>   	    PVE::Diskmanage::locked_disk_action(sub {
>>   		PVE::Diskmanage::assert_disk_unused($dev);
>>   
>> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Disks/LVM.pm b/PVE/API2/Disks/LVM.pm
>> index 6e4331a..a27afe2 100644
>> --- a/PVE/API2/Disks/LVM.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/API2/Disks/LVM.pm
>> @@ -152,6 +152,9 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>>   	PVE::Diskmanage::assert_disk_unused($dev);
>>   	PVE::Storage::assert_sid_unused($name) if $param->{add_storage};
>>   
>> +	die "volume group with name '${name}' already exists\n"
>> +	    if PVE::Storage::LVMPlugin::lvm_vgs()->{$name};
> 
> probably better off inside the worker, since `vgs` might take a while
> (although we also use it in the index API call in this module..)

 From a GUI perspective: putting it in a worker would result in the user to hit 
okay and then will see the failed task right? Keeping it as is will result in an 
error popping up when clicking ok/create and the user can edit the name instead 
of starting all over again. Though, if `vgs` really needs a bit, that error 
popping up could take a moment or two.

[...]

>>   sub preparetree {
>> @@ -336,6 +340,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>>   	my $user = $rpcenv->get_user();
>>   
>>   	my $name = $param->{name};
>> +	my $node = $param->{node};
> 
> nit: please also change the usage further below in this API handler if
> you do this

what exactly do you mean? defining local variables for $param->{..} ones?

> 
>>   	my $devs = [PVE::Tools::split_list($param->{devices})];
>>   	my $raidlevel = $param->{raidlevel};
>>   	my $compression = $param->{compression} // 'on';
>> @@ -346,6 +351,10 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>>   	}
>>   	PVE::Storage::assert_sid_unused($name) if $param->{add_storage};
>>   
>> +	my $pools = get_pool_data();
> 
> and also here
> 
>> +	die "pool '${name}' already exists on node '$node'\n"
>> +	    if grep { $_->{name} eq $name } @{$pools};
>> +
>>   	my $numdisks = scalar(@$devs);
>>   	my $mindisks = {
>>   	    single => 1,
>> -- 
>> 2.30.2
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
>> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-15 11:58 [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v2 0/3] disks: add checks, allow add_storage on other nodes Aaron Lauterer
2022-07-15 11:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v2 1/3] diskmanage: add mounted_paths Aaron Lauterer
2022-08-17 11:35   ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-07-15 11:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v2 2/3] disks: die if storage name is already in use Aaron Lauterer
2022-08-17 11:42   ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-08-18 15:22     ` Aaron Lauterer [this message]
2022-08-18 15:31       ` Aaron Lauterer
2022-08-19  8:21         ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-08-19  9:29           ` Aaron Lauterer
2022-08-19  8:20       ` Fabian Grünbichler
2022-08-19  9:28         ` Aaron Lauterer
2022-07-15 11:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH storage v2 3/3] disks: allow add_storage for already configured local storage Aaron Lauterer
2022-08-17 11:53   ` Fabian Grünbichler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff083011-f422-1d93-d9d5-f667300e03e5@proxmox.com \
    --to=a.lauterer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal