From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] pvesubscription: add missing return statement
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:29:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef3c15fd-9771-45ed-8532-bb09dde57212@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109142356.171494-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
any reason this is relevant you might want to add to the commit
message here?
Am 09/01/2024 um 15:23 schrieb Alexander Zeidler:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm b/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> index 2eb26cb4..2fd641d0 100755
> --- a/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> +++ b/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> PVE::API2::Subscription::check_key($info->{key}, PVE::API2::Subscription::get_sockets());
>
> PVE::API2::Subscription::write_etc_subscription($info);
> +
> + return undef;
simple
return;
is slightly preferred for returning undef, as there is a very rare, but
nasty bug one can hit with returning undef.
I.e., if the call site forces list-context and checks if something is
returned then the `return` works but return undef returns a single undef
element in a (defined) list, thus causing a false-positive fora check like
`if (my @foo = bar()) { ... }`.
As said, this is rather seldom and forced-list context is not that often
used so we do not need to clean up existing code, but for new one it makes
sense to default to a plain `return;` in such cases.
> }});
>
> our $cmddef = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-09 14:23 Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-09 14:23 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/3] pvesubscription: update set-offline-key description Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10 9:41 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-10 11:03 ` Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10 9:55 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-09 14:23 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/3] report: format iptables output for readability Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10 9:54 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-10 9:29 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2024-01-10 10:59 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] pvesubscription: add missing return statement Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-29 9:51 ` Alexander Zeidler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef3c15fd-9771-45ed-8532-bb09dde57212@proxmox.com \
--to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=a.zeidler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox