public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] pvesubscription: add missing return statement
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:29:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef3c15fd-9771-45ed-8532-bb09dde57212@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240109142356.171494-1-a.zeidler@proxmox.com>


any reason this is relevant you might want to add to the commit
message here?

Am 09/01/2024 um 15:23 schrieb Alexander Zeidler:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Zeidler <a.zeidler@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm b/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> index 2eb26cb4..2fd641d0 100755
> --- a/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> +++ b/PVE/CLI/pvesubscription.pm
> @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>  	PVE::API2::Subscription::check_key($info->{key}, PVE::API2::Subscription::get_sockets());
>  
>  	PVE::API2::Subscription::write_etc_subscription($info);
> +
> +	return undef;

simple

return;

is slightly preferred for returning undef, as there is a very rare, but
 nasty bug one can hit with returning undef.
I.e., if the call site forces list-context and checks if something is
returned then the `return` works but return undef returns a single undef
element in a (defined) list, thus causing a false-positive fora check like
`if (my @foo = bar()) { ... }`.

As said, this is rather seldom and forced-list context is not that often
used so we do not need to clean up existing code, but for new one it makes
sense to default to a plain `return;` in such cases.

>  }});
>  
>  our $cmddef = {





  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-10  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-09 14:23 Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-09 14:23 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/3] pvesubscription: update set-offline-key description Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10  9:41   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-10 11:03     ` Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10  9:55   ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-09 14:23 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 3/3] report: format iptables output for readability Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-10  9:54   ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2024-01-10  9:29 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2024-01-10 10:59   ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/3] pvesubscription: add missing return statement Alexander Zeidler
2024-01-29  9:51     ` Alexander Zeidler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ef3c15fd-9771-45ed-8532-bb09dde57212@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=a.zeidler@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal