From: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH storage] Plugins: en/decode notes as UTF-8
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:30:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de99dbe3-71ca-46c4-a259-7fe588acbf72@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2fdb5a9-46f1-d9f5-e28c-437bba73cb05@proxmox.com>
On 3/8/22 19:10, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> On 08.03.22 15:41, Dominik Csapak wrote:
>> When writing into the file, explicitly utf8 encode it, and then try to
>> utf8 decode it on read.
>>
>> If the notes are not valid utf8, we assume it was an iso-8859 comment
>> and return is at is was.
>>
>> Technically this is a breaking change, since there are iso-8859 comments
>> that would sucessfully decode as utf8, for example:
>
> s/sucessfully/successfully/
>
>> the byte sequence "C2 A9" would be "£" in iso, but would decode to "£".
>>
>> From what i can tell though, this is rather unlikely to happen for
>> "real world" notes, because the first byte would be in the range of
>> C0-F7 (which are mostly language dependent characters like "Â")
>> and the following bytes would have to be in the range of
>> 80-BF, which are only special characters like "£" (or undefined)
>
> IMO a bit strange to trying to reason about free-form content that end user can
> edit is hardly going to be right, but oh well you made it sound like really being
> more of an edge case and I'd like to avoid versioning comment notes, so fine for me.
>
yeah, i originally did not want this solution (because some valid input
would be wrongly decoded), but we encountered the same problems about 5
times now (most in pmg), and this time i took the time to look deeper into
which combinations are actually valid that would be decoded. and it turns
out that there are not really sensible ones. i guess there will be
at least some people affected by this, but we can simply tell them
to enter the comment again and it will be fixed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dominik Csapak <d.csapak@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> we may want to have this 'try_decode_utf8' in PVE::Tools i guess?
>> i just put it here for the RFC, so its more easy to review
>
> meh, it's hardly any complicated logic, just calling into Encode and falling
> back, but yeah the version below makes it seem a bit bloated, you made a one
> liner expand into 14 ^^
>
>>
>> PVE/Storage.pm | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm | 9 +++++++--
>> PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/Storage.pm b/PVE/Storage.pm
>> index b1d31bb..4335ee9 100755
>> --- a/PVE/Storage.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/Storage.pm
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ use File::Path;
>> use Cwd 'abs_path';
>> use Socket;
>> use Time::Local qw(timelocal);
>> +use Encode qw(decode);
>>
>> use PVE::Tools qw(run_command file_read_firstline dir_glob_foreach $IPV6RE);
>> use PVE::Cluster qw(cfs_read_file cfs_write_file cfs_lock_file);
>> @@ -2077,4 +2078,20 @@ sub normalize_content_filename {
>> return $filename;
>> }
>>
>> +sub try_decode_utf8 {
>> + my ($data) = @_;
>> +
>> + my $decoded = eval {
>> + decode('UTF-8', $data, 1);
>> + };
>
> assignment evals should to be in a single line if text width allows it
>
>> +
>> + if (!defined($decoded)) {
>> + # we could not decode, it's probably iso-8859,
>> + # so return original value
>
> please stop breaking up comments always that early
>
>> + return $data;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return $decoded;
>> +}
>> +
>
> In general, why not just inline it? The following would be just as good as the whole
> 14 line method here...
>
> my $foo = eval { decode('UTF-8', $data, 1) } // $data;
>
>
> And if we want it centrally, then we want a set/get_notes helper somewhere around
> that does the note-exists check + encode stuff, but as all is very centrally for now
> and churn is not /that/ likely I'd slightly favoring just in-lining it..
sorry, i was so caught up with wanting to make this *very* explicit, that
i overlooked the obvious one-liner. my intention was to have a single
place were we do this with a short explanation (since we also want
to do this in some pmg cases), but inlining it with a good commit message
is more than enough...
thanks for pointing it out!
sending a v1 shortly
>
>> 1;
>> diff --git a/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm
>> index c60818b..bc559e6 100644
>> --- a/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/Storage/DirPlugin.pm
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ use Cwd;
>> use File::Path;
>> use IO::File;
>> use POSIX;
>> +use Encode qw(encode);
>>
>> use PVE::Storage::Plugin;
>> use PVE::JSONSchema qw(get_standard_option);
>> @@ -103,7 +104,10 @@ sub get_volume_notes {
>> my $path = $class->filesystem_path($scfg, $volname);
>> $path .= $class->SUPER::NOTES_EXT;
>>
>> - return PVE::Tools::file_get_contents($path) if -f $path;
>> + if (-f $path) {
>> + my $data = PVE::Tools::file_get_contents($path);
>> + return PVE::Storage::try_decode_utf8($data);
>
> return eval { decode('UTF-8', $data, 1) } // $data;
>
>> + }
>>
>> return '';
>> }
>> @@ -120,7 +124,8 @@ sub update_volume_notes {
>> $path .= $class->SUPER::NOTES_EXT;
>>
>> if (defined($notes) && $notes ne '') {
>> - PVE::Tools::file_set_contents($path, $notes);
>> + my $encoded = encode('UTF-8', $notes);
>> + PVE::Tools::file_set_contents($path, $encoded);
>> } else {
>> unlink $path or $! == ENOENT or die "could not delete notes - $!\n";
>> }
>> diff --git a/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm b/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> index a6b0bdd..edec516 100644
>> --- a/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ my $get_subdir_files = sub {
>> my $notes_fn = $original.NOTES_EXT;
>> if (-f $notes_fn) {
>> my $notes = PVE::Tools::file_read_firstline($notes_fn);
>> - $info->{notes} = $notes if defined($notes);
>> + $info->{notes} = PVE::Storage::try_decode_utf8($notes) if defined($notes);
>
> $info->{notes} = eval { decode('UTF-8', $notes, 1) } // $notes if defined($notes)
>
>> }
>>
>> $info->{protected} = 1 if -e PVE::Storage::protection_file_path($original);
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-09 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-08 14:41 Dominik Csapak
2022-03-08 18:10 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2022-03-09 7:30 ` Dominik Csapak [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de99dbe3-71ca-46c4-a259-7fe588acbf72@proxmox.com \
--to=d.csapak@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox