public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
	Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC cluster 1/2] pvecm: updatecerts: allow specifying time to wait for quorum via CLI argument
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 16:36:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d44abd56-c235-3eb3-b74e-206cb110d0e5@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8f1c8b8-89ae-93cc-5c8d-6c75522401e0@proxmox.com>

Am 29.06.23 um 16:26 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
> Am 29/06/2023 um 15:59 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
>> Useful for the updatecerts call triggered via the ExecStartPre hook
>> for pveproxy.service.
>>
>> When starting a node that's part of a cluster, there is a time window
>> between the start of pve-cluster.service and when quorum is reached
>> (from the node's perspective). pveproxy.service is ordered after
>> pve-cluster.service, but that does not prevent the ExecStartPre hook
>> from being executed before the node is part of the quorate partition.
>> The pvecm updatecerts command won't do anything without quorum.
>>
>> In particular, it might happen that the base directories for observed
>> files will not get created during/after the upgrade from Proxmox VE 7
>> to 8 (reported in the community forum [0] and reproduced right away in
>> a virtual test cluster).
>>
>> This parameter will allow to increase the chances for successful
>> execution of the hook.
>>
>> [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/129644/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>  src/PVE/CLI/pvecm.pm | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> 
> Hmm, I would just do something like (untested and needs importing Time::HiRes):
> 
> 
> @@ -576,6 +578,11 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>         # IO (on /etc/pve) which can hang (uninterruptedly D state). That'd be
>         # no-good for ExecStartPre as it fails the whole service in this case
>         PVE::Tools::run_fork_with_timeout(30, sub {
> +           for (my $i = 0; !PVE::Cluster::check_cfs_quorum(1); $i++) {
> +               print "waiting for pmxcfs mount to appear and get quorate...\n" if $i % 50 == 0;
> +               usleep(100 * 1000);
> +               $i++;
> +           }
>             PVE::Cluster::Setup::updatecerts_and_ssh($param->@{qw(force silent)});
>             PVE::Cluster::prepare_observed_file_basedirs();
>         });
> 
> 
> after all any user or tooling calling this want's it to happen, so waiting until
> the timeout seems sensible enough as hard coded default to me..

The issue here is that it would delay the pveproxy.service start a full
30 seconds when a node can't get quorum (e.g. after all nodes in a
cluster were down). Is that tolerable?




  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-29 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-29 13:59 Fiona Ebner
2023-06-29 13:59 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH cluster 2/2] fix typo Fiona Ebner
2023-06-29 13:59 ` [pve-devel] [RFC manager] pveproxy service: specify wait time for pvecm updatecerts command Fiona Ebner
2023-06-29 14:26 ` [pve-devel] [RFC cluster 1/2] pvecm: updatecerts: allow specifying time to wait for quorum via CLI argument Thomas Lamprecht
2023-06-29 14:36   ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
2023-06-29 14:55     ` Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d44abd56-c235-3eb3-b74e-206cb110d0e5@proxmox.com \
    --to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal