From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] fix #5008: prevent adding pbs storage with invalid namespace
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:09:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0758df6-5eed-4862-90d2-3cd547ffa966@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e09708f-4259-4784-99c8-7e8115a0eb56@proxmox.com>
Am 15/11/2023 um 11:05 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>
>
> On 11/15/23 10:52, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> Am 15/11/2023 um 10:37 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>>> On 11/15/23 09:31, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>>>> Am 14.11.23 um 15:27 schrieb Philipp Hufnagl:
>>>>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> index 4320974..aceb2c4 100644
>>>>> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/PBSPlugin.pm
>>>>> @@ -817,6 +817,17 @@ sub scan_datastores {
>>>>> return $response;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +sub scan_namespaces {
>>>>> + my ($scfg, $datastore, $password) = @_;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + my $conn = pbs_api_connect($scfg, $password);
>>>>
>>>> Not super important, but would be nice to have a way to re-use the same
>>>> connection in scan_datastores() and here, since activate_storage() will
>>>> call both of them.
>>>
>>> scan_datastores() seem to be called somewhere else as well. I see if I
>>> can find a way to reuse the connection but not break the code there.
>>
>>
>> In the long run it maybe could be better to have an explicit check_availability
>> hook, but IMO it's a bit late in the release cycle for that as this needs a bit
>> extra care, especially w.r.t. external plugins and our ABI compat.
>>
>> Anyhow, as workaround we might be able to do this check in the on_add_hook and
>> on_update_hook methods for now.
>
> I am planning on introducing a function called "connect_if_none" that
> checks if it gets passed a connection and if so, return it. If it gets
> passed undef, it will establish a connection and return that one.
>
> That way a user can simply write something like
>
> my $conn = connect_if_none($scfg, $password, $conn);
>
> and not worry about it.
not sure how above fits to my comment at all...
Connection re-use is not the real issue here, doing it senslessy on every
activate is..
And connect_if_none is a rather generic/undescriptive name and still would
not solve re-use if done in different method calls, so a rather for only
a very limited use case where one can just pass $conn around directly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-15 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 14:27 Philipp Hufnagl
2023-11-15 8:31 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-11-15 9:37 ` Philipp Hufnagl
2023-11-15 9:52 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-11-15 10:05 ` Philipp Hufnagl
2023-11-15 10:09 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2023-11-15 10:40 ` Philipp Hufnagl
2023-11-15 10:01 ` Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0758df6-5eed-4862-90d2-3cd547ffa966@proxmox.com \
--to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=p.hufnagl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox