public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
Subject: [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH container v2 2/6] api: status: move config locking from API handler into worker
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:26:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa5b92ea-2f6a-4ee4-8a2e-7a13da990739@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130171057.438025-3-f.weber@proxmox.com>

Am 30/01/2024 um 18:10 schrieb Friedrich Weber:
> Previously, container start/stop/shutdown/suspend would try to acquire
> the config lock in the API handler prior to forking a worker. If the
> lock was currently held elsewhere, this would block the API handler
> and thus the pvedaemon worker thread until the 10s timeout expired (or
> the lock could be acquired).
> 
> To avoid blocking the API handler, immediately fork off a worker
> process and try to acquire the config lock in that worker.
> 
> Patch best viewed with `git show -w`.
> 
> Suggested-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumiller@proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     The diff is somewhat messy without `-w` -- couldn't come up with a
>     better way.
>     
>     new in v2
> 
>  src/PVE/API2/LXC/Status.pm | 91 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> 
>

applied this one already, thanks!

btw. in general getting some early timeout sent as response to the initial
request would be good, but blocking the daemon worker is naturally a no-go.
And bringing in Anyevent somehow to make it async-like might be a PITA, so
for now this change is OK.

Oh, and it might be worth mentioning explicitly in the next release notes,
as it's a change in behavior that could theoretically throw up some
tooling that depends on the $action not failing due to locking if the
adapted endpoints returned – albeit IMO a bit silly to assume that (as the
actions can fail in other ways inside the worker anyway).




  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 17:10 [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common/container/qemu-server/manager v2 0/6] fix #4474: stop tasks may overrule shutdown tasks Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common v2 1/6] guest helpers: add helper to overrule active tasks of a specific type Friedrich Weber
2024-04-04 15:20   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-04-05 13:13     ` Friedrich Weber
2024-04-06  8:37       ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-04-08  8:38         ` Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 2/6] api: status: move config locking from API handler into worker Friedrich Weber
2024-04-04 15:26   ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2024-04-05 13:16     ` [pve-devel] applied: " Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH container v2 3/6] fix #4474: lxc api: add overrule-shutdown parameter to stop endpoint Friedrich Weber
2024-04-06 15:07   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-04-08  8:59     ` Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v2 4/6] fix #4474: qemu " Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v2 5/6] ui: fix typo to make pve-cluster-tasks store globally available Friedrich Weber
2024-01-30 17:10 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v2 6/6] fix #4474: ui: guest stop: offer to overrule active shutdown tasks Friedrich Weber
2024-04-03  6:55 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH guest-common/container/qemu-server/manager v2 0/6] fix #4474: stop tasks may overrule " Friedrich Weber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa5b92ea-2f6a-4ee4-8a2e-7a13da990739@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.weber@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal