From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: "Thomas Lamprecht" <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
"Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
"Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/1] fix: ha: set ha-managed param default and unchecked value to undefined
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DEB5GTM8YZKK.1MHZATRWF7O1@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daa9e59e-8077-48ee-8497-22d73a0b2ab7@proxmox.com>
Thanks for the detailed feedback! Sent a v2 with a better commit
message and only uncheckedValue set explicitly.
https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20251117173321.240894-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com
On Mon Nov 17, 2025 at 5:47 PM CET, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> The commit subject could be a bit improved, as of now we do not use plain
> "fix" commits, besides that it affects the ui subsystem, which is a major
> one in this repo, so naming it makes sense, then it's not really for ha
> itself but rather for the (guest) create wizard, and finally, the commit
> message and it's subject should focus on what's fixed and ideally (in short)
> why thefix works and was chosen rather than describing how it is done,
> especially not if that's just then a rather literal description of the
> actual diff itself.
>
> E.g. here the following would be a lot clearer to me:
>
> "ui: create wizard: only submit ha-managed if checked for better compat"
>
>
> Am 17.11.25 um 14:17 schrieb Michael Köppl:
>> This avoids sending the parameter with the default value when it's not
>> necessary, since the API already defines the param as optional and
>> assigns a default value of 0.
>
> Why does this work though, 0 and undefined seem close enough for anybody
> without in-depth knowledge about ExtJS and/or our widget-toolkit.
>
> Would be nice to reference upstream docs for chechbox's uncheckedValue
> config parameter, which plays the core part here:
>
>> By default this is undefined, which results in nothing being submitted
>> for the checkbox field when the form is submitted
>
> -- https://docs.sencha.com/extjs/7.0.0/classic/Ext.form.field.Checkbox.html#cfg-uncheckedValue
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Köppl <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> Thanks to @Friedrich for bringing this to my attention. A case where
>> this occurs is in clusters where at least one of the nodes does not yet
>> support the ha-managed param and a VM is created on that node from the
>> web UI of a node that already supports it. Although in general it can
>> probably be expected that all nodes should be upgraded to a new version,
>> this avoids failing the CreateWizard dialog entirely for cases where the
>> "Add to HA" checkbox wasn't even checked at basically no cost because
>> the API already defines a default value of 0 and considers the param
>> optional.
>>
>> www/manager6/lxc/CreateWizard.js | 4 ++--
>> www/manager6/qemu/CreateWizard.js | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/www/manager6/lxc/CreateWizard.js b/www/manager6/lxc/CreateWizard.js
>> index f35709f14..024536c58 100644
>> --- a/www/manager6/lxc/CreateWizard.js
>> +++ b/www/manager6/lxc/CreateWizard.js
>> @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ Ext.define('PVE.lxc.CreateWizard', {
>> {
>> xtype: 'proxmoxcheckbox',
>> name: 'ha-managed',
>> - uncheckedValue: 0,
>> - defaultValue: 0,
>> + uncheckedValue: undefined,
>> + defaultValue: undefined,
>
> Both are the default for (proxmox)checkbox, so could be just omitted? Or if, then
> I'd just set "uncheckedValue" explicitly and add a small comment there so that it's
> a bit more explicit and telling.
>
>> fieldLabel: gettext('Add to HA'),
>> },
>> ],
>> diff --git a/www/manager6/qemu/CreateWizard.js b/www/manager6/qemu/CreateWizard.js
>> index e0c56bc0b..564ca1176 100644
>> --- a/www/manager6/qemu/CreateWizard.js
>> +++ b/www/manager6/qemu/CreateWizard.js
>> @@ -99,8 +99,8 @@ Ext.define('PVE.qemu.CreateWizard', {
>> {
>> xtype: 'proxmoxcheckbox',
>> name: 'ha-managed',
>> - uncheckedValue: 0,
>> - defaultValue: 0,
>> + uncheckedValue: undefined,
>> + defaultValue: undefined,
>
> Same here.
>
>> fieldLabel: gettext('Add to HA'),
>> },
>> ],
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-17 13:18 Michael Köppl
2025-11-17 16:47 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-11-17 17:35 ` Michael Köppl [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DEB5GTM8YZKK.1MHZATRWF7O1@proxmox.com \
--to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox