From: "Daniel Kral" <d.kral@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container/docs/ha-manager/manager/widget-toolkit/qemu-server v3 00/11] fix #6613: update HA rules upon resource deletion
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 13:18:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DD7SMMTHQCDD.16I4IU38T1NX3@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250930145848.263162-1-m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
On Tue Sep 30, 2025 at 4:58 PM CEST, Michael Köppl wrote:
> This patch series aims to fix #6613 [0]. Although an implementation was
> proposed in the past, it was not applied since it was unclear how to
> handle the case where the removed resource is the last resource in a
> rule.
>
[...]
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebase on latest master
> - Split up widget-toolkit patches to make review easier. The intention
> for patches 1/4 to 3/4 of widget-toolkit is to keep the functionality
> of SafeDestroy intact (no changes in behavior for SafeDestroyGuest,
> SafeDestroyStorage, and other SafeDestroy dialogs), only adding
> additional functionality that is then moved to ConfirmRemoveDialog in
> 4/4, where the default settings are then changed in
> ConfirmRemoveDialog and SafeDestroy explicitly sets the parameters to
> keep behavior intact.
> - Instead of replacing SafeDestroy with ConfirmRemoveDialog and
> requiring additional changes to windows extending SafeDestroy, make
> SafeDestroy extend ConfirmRemoveDialog, encapsulating the specific
> settings of a SafeDestroy dialog. This also makes the original
> follow-up series obsolete [2].
The changes look good to me and it's much easier to review now that the
changes done to SafeDestroy are visible as a diff instead.. It might be
considered as confusing that first functionality is added to SafeDestroy
and afterwards moved to another new component after only a few patches,
but I don't see that as a reason to not ACK this.
I tested this for all cases for the CLI/API/GUI for removing a HA
resource and the whole VM/CT with purge set/cleared and it works as
expected. I also tested that other SafeDestroy users still work for PVE
and PBS (only installing proxmox-widget-toolkit there) and that worked
fine as well.
Thanks for the work, consider this as:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 14:58 Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 1/2] fix #6613: update rules containing the resource to be deleted Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager v3 2/2] api: add purge parameter for resource deletion Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server v3 1/1] fix #6613: pass purge param to delete_service_from_config Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH container " Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v3 1/4] window: refactor construction of SafeDestroy items Michael Köppl
2025-10-02 11:35 ` Daniel Kral
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v3 2/4] window: introduce dangerous parameter to SafeDestroy Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v3 3/4] window: make buttons in SafeDestroy configurable Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH widget-toolkit v3 4/4] window: add more general base dialog, make SafeDestroy concrete Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 1/2] ui: add ConfirmRemoveResource window Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager v3 2/2] ui: use ConfirmRemoveResource window for removing resources Michael Köppl
2025-09-30 14:58 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs v3 1/1] add notes about effects of purge flag for resource and guest removal Michael Köppl
2025-10-02 11:18 ` Daniel Kral [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DD7SMMTHQCDD.16I4IU38T1NX3@proxmox.com \
--to=d.kral@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox