From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: "Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 18/18] factor out counting of active services into helper
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:44:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCEX5UPL3KL6.ORBGQ1VTIZH1@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821143705.256562-19-d.kral@proxmox.com>
During my review I was wondering why 16/18 and 17/18 added similar
checks to both the manager's and the API's active service counting and
why they're not combined into a single helper function, only to then
notice that the final patch does exactly that. Is there a reason it's
done in this order? Other patches in this series do it the other way
around or combine the introduction of a new helper function and its use.
On Thu Aug 21, 2025 at 4:35 PM CEST, Daniel Kral wrote:
> Make the counting its own helper to be used throughout the code base to
> have a single source of truth of what constitutes a active services.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/PVE/API2/HA/Status.pm | 25 +++----------------------
> src/PVE/HA/LRM.pm | 20 +-------------------
> src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm | 14 +-------------
> src/PVE/HA/Tools.pm | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/PVE/API2/HA/Status.pm b/src/PVE/API2/HA/Status.pm
> index 3d9aabaa..282577cc 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/API2/HA/Status.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/API2/HA/Status.pm
> @@ -193,28 +193,9 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> };
> }
>
> - # compute active services for all nodes
> - my $active_count = {};
> - foreach my $sid (sort keys %{ $status->{service_status} }) {
> - my $sd = $status->{service_status}->{$sid};
> - my $target = $sd->{target}; # count as active if we are the target.
> - next if !$sd->{node};
> - $active_count->{ $sd->{node} } = 0 if !defined($active_count->{ $sd->{node} });
> - my $req_state = $sd->{state};
> - next if !defined($req_state);
> - next if $req_state eq 'stopped';
> - next if $req_state eq 'freeze';
> - next if $req_state eq 'error';
> - next if $req_state eq 'request_start';
> - $active_count->{ $sd->{node} }++;
> -
> - if ($target && $target ne $sd->{node}) {
> - $active_count->{$target} = 0 if !defined($active_count->{$target});
> - $active_count->{$target}++;
> - }
> - }
> -
> foreach my $node (sort keys %{ $status->{node_status} }) {
> + my $active_count =
> + PVE::HA::Tools::count_active_services($status->{service_status}, $node);
> my $lrm_status = PVE::HA::Config::read_lrm_status($node);
> my $id = "lrm:$node";
> if (!$lrm_status->{timestamp}) {
> @@ -235,7 +216,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
> if ($lrm_mode ne 'active') {
> $status_str = "$lrm_mode mode";
> } else {
> - if ($lrm_state eq 'wait_for_agent_lock' && !$active_count->{$node}) {
> + if ($lrm_state eq 'wait_for_agent_lock' && !$active_count) {
> $status_str = 'idle';
> } else {
> $status_str = $lrm_state;
> diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/LRM.pm b/src/PVE/HA/LRM.pm
> index b645e5b0..1342c8eb 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/HA/LRM.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/HA/LRM.pm
> @@ -297,25 +297,7 @@ sub active_service_count {
>
> my $ss = $self->{service_status};
>
> - my $count = 0;
> - foreach my $sid (keys %$ss) {
> - my $sd = $ss->{$sid};
> - my $target = $sd->{target}; # count as active if we are the target.
> - next if (!$sd->{node} || $sd->{node} ne $nodename) && (!$target || $target ne $nodename);
> - my $req_state = $sd->{state};
> - next if !defined($req_state);
> - next if $req_state eq 'stopped';
> - # NOTE: 'ignored' ones are already dropped by the manager from service_status
> - next if $req_state eq 'freeze';
> - # erroneous services are not managed by HA, don't count them as active
> - next if $req_state eq 'error';
> - # request_start is for (optional) better node selection for stop -> started transition
> - next if $req_state eq 'request_start';
> -
> - $count++;
> - }
> -
> - return $count;
> + return PVE::HA::Tools::count_active_services($ss, $nodename);
> }
>
> my $wrote_lrm_status_at_startup = 0;
> diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
> index 0cbeb28d..374c9022 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/HA/Manager.pm
> @@ -540,19 +540,7 @@ my $have_groups_been_migrated = sub {
> my $is_lrm_active_or_idle = sub {
> my ($ss, $node, $lrm_state) = @_;
>
> - my $active_count = 0;
> - for my $sid (sort keys %$ss) {
> - my $sd = $ss->{$sid};
> - my $target = $sd->{target}; # count as active if we are the target.
> - next if (!$sd->{node} || $sd->{node} ne $node) && (!$target || $target ne $node);
> - my $req_state = $sd->{state};
> - next if !defined($req_state);
> - next if $req_state eq 'stopped';
> - next if $req_state eq 'freeze';
> - next if $req_state eq 'error';
> - next if $req_state eq 'request_start';
> - $active_count++;
> - }
> + my $active_count = PVE::HA::Tools::count_active_services($ss, $node);
>
> return 1 if $lrm_state eq 'active';
> return 1 if $lrm_state eq 'wait_for_agent_lock' && !$active_count;
> diff --git a/src/PVE/HA/Tools.pm b/src/PVE/HA/Tools.pm
> index 47b4aa03..32f08723 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/HA/Tools.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/HA/Tools.pm
> @@ -188,6 +188,31 @@ sub count_fenced_services {
> return $count;
> }
>
> +sub count_active_services {
> + my ($ss, $node) = @_;
> +
> + my $count = 0;
> +
> + foreach my $sid (keys %$ss) {
> + my $sd = $ss->{$sid};
> + my $target = $sd->{target}; # count as active if we are the target.
> + next if (!$sd->{node} || $sd->{node} ne $node) && (!$target || $target ne $node);
> + my $req_state = $sd->{state};
> + next if !defined($req_state);
> + next if $req_state eq 'stopped';
> + # NOTE: 'ignored' ones are already dropped by the manager from service_status
> + next if $req_state eq 'freeze';
> + # erroneous services are not managed by HA, don't count them as active
> + next if $req_state eq 'error';
> + # request_start is for (optional) better node selection for stop -> started transition
> + next if $req_state eq 'request_start';
> +
> + $count++;
> + }
> +
> + return $count;
> +}
> +
> sub get_verbose_service_state {
> my ($service_state, $service_conf) = @_;
>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 14:35 [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 00/18] HA rules fixes + cleanup + performance improvements Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 01/18] config: do not add ignored resources to dependent resources Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 02/18] manager: retranslate rules if nodes are added or removed Daniel Kral
2025-08-27 13:41 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-27 14:33 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-27 14:55 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 03/18] rules: factor out disjoint rules' resource set helper Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 04/18] rules: resource affinity: inter-consistency check with merged positive rules Daniel Kral
2025-08-29 12:43 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-29 13:28 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 05/18] rules: add merged positive resource affinity info in global checks Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 06/18] rules: make rules sorting optional in foreach_rule helper Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 07/18] rename rule's canonicalize stage to transform stage Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 08/18] rules: make plugins register transformers instead of plugin_transform Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 09/18] rules: node affinity: decouple get_node_affinity helper from Usage class Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 10/18] compile ha rules to a more compact representation Daniel Kral
2025-08-27 15:19 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-29 12:43 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-29 13:42 ` Daniel Kral
2025-09-02 7:32 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 11/18] test: rules: use to_json instead of Data::Dumper for config output Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 12/18] test: rules: add compiled config output to rules config test cases Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 13/18] rules: node affinity: define node priority outside hash access Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 14/18] move minimum version check helper to ha tools Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 15/18] manager: move group migration cooldown variable into helper Daniel Kral
2025-08-29 12:43 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 16/18] api: status: sync active service counting with lrm's helper Daniel Kral
2025-09-02 8:10 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 17/18] manager: group migration: " Daniel Kral
2025-08-21 14:35 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 18/18] factor out counting of active services into helper Daniel Kral
2025-08-29 12:44 ` Michael Köppl [this message]
2025-08-29 13:36 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-29 12:44 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH ha-manager 00/18] HA rules fixes + cleanup + performance improvements Michael Köppl
2025-08-29 13:52 ` Daniel Kral
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DCEX5UPL3KL6.ORBGQ1VTIZH1@proxmox.com \
--to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel-bounces@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox