From: "Christoph Heiss" <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
To: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 2/7] move RAID setup checks to RAID level enum implementations
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:46:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB6PWYI01WKP.1A3OP0BNBK4V5@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d66a3fa-e7ce-49e7-805d-5f4bccc553f6@proxmox.com>
On Tue Jul 8, 2025 at 2:01 PM CEST, Michael Köppl wrote:
> On 7/7/25 13:47, Christoph Heiss wrote:
>>> +
>>> + for v in zfs_raid_variants {
>>> + assert!(v.check_disks(&[]).is_err());
>>> + assert!(v.check_disks(&disks[..v.get_min_disks() - 1]).is_err());
>>> + assert!(v.check_disks(&disks[..v.get_min_disks()]).is_ok());
>>> + assert!(v.check_disks(&disks).is_ok());
>>> + }
>>> }
>>
>> These unit tests should be moved to `proxmox_installer_common::options`,
>> if the implementation of these methods also resides there.
>
> First of all, thanks for having a look at this! True, I forgot to move
> the tests as well. Will move them for v4. Right now, both sets of unit
> tests (for proxmox_installer_common::options and
> proxmox_installer_common::disk_checks) use the dummy_disks and
> dummy_disk helpers. I think simply copying the implementation of these
> over to the options.rs tests is fine since the implementation is not
> exactly complicated and it seems a bit overkill to introduce some sort
> of test utils for this. What do you think?
As for dummy_disk(), you could potentially make it a (static) method on
the `Disk` type itself, gating it on `#[cfg(test)]`.
That would avoid some extra test utilities somewhere, while still having
the benefit of being able to deduplicate it (even if trivial).
We already use a similar pattern already in the setup code, see e.g.
proxmox_installer_common::setup::ProductConfig::mocked()
dummy_disks() being a one-liner can of course be simply copied over.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 15:11 [pve-devel] [PATCH docs/installer v3 0/8] add early disk and network sanity checks Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 1/7] auto: add early answer file sanity check for RAID configurations Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 2/7] move RAID setup checks to RAID level enum implementations Michael Köppl
2025-07-07 11:47 ` Christoph Heiss
2025-07-08 12:01 ` Michael Köppl
2025-07-08 13:46 ` Christoph Heiss [this message]
2025-07-08 14:36 ` Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 3/7] close #5887: add sanity check for LVM swapsize Michael Köppl
2025-07-07 12:07 ` Christoph Heiss
2025-07-08 17:45 ` Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 4/7] auto: add check for duplicate disks in answer file Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 5/7] common: add more descriptive errors for invalid network configs Michael Köppl
2025-07-07 12:37 ` Christoph Heiss
2025-07-08 17:34 ` Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 6/7] tui: change get_value return type for easier error handling Michael Köppl
2025-07-07 12:56 ` Christoph Heiss
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer v3 7/7] common: add checks for valid subnet mask and IPv4 address within subnet Michael Köppl
2025-06-26 15:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-docs v3 1/1] installation: remove maxroot size requirement and mention default instead Michael Köppl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB6PWYI01WKP.1A3OP0BNBK4V5@proxmox.com \
--to=c.heiss@proxmox.com \
--cc=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox