From: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server/storage 0/3] fix #5779: introduce guest hints to pass rxbounce flag to KRBD
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:02:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82562115-907d-41d2-b3c1-ee8bbc91d1d8@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024122705.93761-1-f.weber@proxmox.com>
On 24/10/2025 14:27, Friedrich Weber wrote:
> [...]
> Obstacles I faced so far:
>
> - The biggest obstacle is that we need to update all callers of
> activate_volumes to pass guest hints where possible. This means that optimally
> all callers should be able to generate the guest hints. Right now, there is
> only the 'guest-ostype' hint which is taken from the VM config. Currently, this
> is not always available to the caller of activate_volumes, sometimes
> some extra work/refactoring would be needed to get it (e.g. see
> PVE::QemuServer::QemuImage::convert or PVE::QemuServer::clone_disk),
> so this needs quite some code changes, which I have not done in all cases in
> this RFC.
>
> - There are also some indirect callers of activate_volumes, e.g. via
> PVE::Storage::abs_filesystem_path or PVE::Storage::storage_migrate -- these
> would also need to be extended to accept hints (not done in this RFC)
>
> - Initially, to avoid having to modify all (direct+indirect) callers of
> activate_volumes, I thought I could pass the hints only at the few "relevant"
> call sites (i.e., when starting a VM), but then noticed that volumes may be
> activated by an action unrelated to a VM start (e.g. a clone), then stay
> active, and not be re-activated by a VM start. So if e.g. we do not pass the
> hints on clone, the KRBD volume would be mapped without rxbounce, stay active,
> and when starting the VM, a user could run into the original problem again.
> So we can't get away with only passing hints to the few relevant call sites,
> and actually need to pass them everywhere (where possible).
>
Thomas and I discussed this point off-list:
- to clarify: if a Windows guest volume was mapped with KRBD without
rxbounce (e.g. by a clone where the activate_volumes caller doesn't pass
$hints) and doesn't get unmapped, and then a VM start activates the
volumes again (passing $hints this time so we'd like to pass rxbounce),
RBDPlugin::map_volume will early-exit because the volume is already mapped:
sub map_volume {
my ($class, $storeid, $scfg, $volname, $snapname) = @_;
my ($vtype, $img_name, $vmid) = $class->parse_volname($volname);
my $name = $img_name;
$name .= '@' . $snapname if $snapname;
my $kerneldev = get_rbd_dev_path($scfg, $storeid, $name);
return $kerneldev if -b $kerneldev; # already mapped
[...]
}
... which is the VM will just use the guest volume without rxbounce and
the user can run into the issue.
- we discussed whether, to avoid this, we could apply the rxbounce
option "on the fly" to an already-mapped volume. I looked a bit [1] and
didn't see any way to apply rxbounce to an already-mapped volume.
Calling `rbd map` again apparently just maps the volume a second time
which doesn't sound like a good idea, and an `rbd unmap` followed by an
`rbd map` (with rxbounce) is likely not safe either?
[1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/reef/man/8/rbd/
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 12:25 Friedrich Weber
2025-10-24 12:25 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 1/2] plugin: map/activate volume: allow callers to pass hints Friedrich Weber
2025-10-28 12:17 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-10-24 12:25 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-storage 2/2] plugin: rbd: pass rxbounce when mapping Windows VM disks Friedrich Weber
2025-10-28 12:19 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-10-28 15:35 ` Friedrich Weber
2025-10-24 12:25 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server 1/1] fix #5997: qemu: pass guest-ostype hint when activating volumes Friedrich Weber
2025-10-28 9:02 ` Friedrich Weber [this message]
2025-10-28 10:50 ` [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server/storage 0/3] fix #5779: introduce guest hints to pass rxbounce flag to KRBD Fiona Ebner
2025-10-28 11:12 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-10-28 12:10 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-10-28 16:35 ` Friedrich Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82562115-907d-41d2-b3c1-ee8bbc91d1d8@proxmox.com \
--to=f.weber@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox