public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: Christoph Heiss <c.heiss@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH pve-installer 6/6] closes #5757: common: add checks for valid IPv4 address within subnet
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:20:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a413f16-71b7-4582-88c4-3ace1f347a26@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D9I74CTEHVFV.POZJ09D616IN@proxmox.com>

On 4/28/25 12:22, Christoph Heiss wrote:
> At least for IPv4 /31 prefixes, this check (including the network
> address part) is wrong. RFC 3021 [0] explicitly allows such subnets for
> point-to-point links.
> 
> E.g. 192.168.0.0/31 is a valid subnet with 2 hosts, 192.168.0.0/31 and
> 192.168.0.1/31.
> 
> [0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3021

You're right, I missed that. Thanks! I think for /32 and /31 it makes 
sense to explicitly allow them, avoiding the calculations done for any 
other valid subnet mask. I'll adapt the implementation accordingly in a v2.


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-28 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-22 16:27 [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 0/6] add early disk and network sanity checks Michael Köppl
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer 1/6] auto: add early answer file sanity check for RAID configurations Michael Köppl
2025-04-28 11:25   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-28 14:31     ` Michael Köppl
2025-04-29  8:26       ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-29  9:32         ` Michael Köppl
2025-04-29  9:40           ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer 2/6] common: use get_min_disks as single source of truth for RAID config checks Michael Köppl
2025-04-28 11:48   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-28 15:36     ` Michael Köppl
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH pve-installer 3/6] close #5887: add sanity check for LVM swapsize and maxroot Michael Köppl
2025-04-28 12:00   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-29 11:30     ` Michael Köppl
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer 4/6] run rustfmt Michael Köppl
2025-04-23 11:56   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-25 12:22     ` Michael Köppl
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-installer 5/6] common: add more descriptive errors for invalid network configs Michael Köppl
2025-04-28 12:20   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-22 16:27 ` [pve-devel] [RFC PATCH pve-installer 6/6] closes #5757: common: add checks for valid IPv4 address within subnet Michael Köppl
2025-04-28 10:22   ` Christoph Heiss
2025-04-28 14:20     ` Michael Köppl [this message]
2025-04-28 12:25 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 0/6] add early disk and network sanity checks Christoph Heiss
2025-04-29 14:14   ` Michael Köppl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a413f16-71b7-4582-88c4-3ace1f347a26@proxmox.com \
    --to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
    --cc=c.heiss@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal