public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	aderumier@odiso.com, pve-devel <pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] qemu 6 : does proxmox backup handle parallel async chunck backup like the new backup code from qemu 6.0 ?
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:58:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <676f24c5-1645-f14e-8650-8b5cf1715566@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30b3e3feb72fa3c4c209d1ab64e07512676910a2.camel@odiso.com>

Hi,

On 02.06.21 08:39, aderumier@odiso.com wrote:
> I was looking for qemu 6.0 new features,
> and it seem that they have implement parallel async chunks backup (and
> I think for other block operations, through a new block-copy feature)
> 
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/71eed4cebed487a4f3c9f97aba83c611bbe22f8d
> 
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/de4641b46b020c5b332175f80e8bfe3d352888e8#diff-b33323044f2699244c126c6eae6c4083c3c99a16f4840030ac13238b1f569dc0
> 
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/26be9d62dd5f5268b814da24fd8e8b5c5b999ebe
> 
> Is it alrealy implemented or on the roadmap for the proxmox backup code
> ?
> (To be honest, I didn't follow proxmox backup patches since a long
> time, so I really don't known how much they are sharing with qemu
> backup code)

the parallel stuff works with our implementation, Stefan tried it and with their
default the backup is much faster, so fast that the guest cannot do anything during
that anymore :D So, IIRC, Stefan turned the default number of parallel operations down
for a better balance of backup speed and guest impact.

FYI, we have basic packages for bullseye as base ready here, and possible sync to
pvetest in the next days/weeks - in those repos there's already QEMU 6.0.

Something else we can use with Bullseye/PVE 7 is io_uring instead of AIO, looks like
a much saner (and actually useful) design and there should be some, at least slight,
improvements due to that too.

https://kernel.dk/io_uring.pdf

cheers,
Thomas




  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-02  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-02  6:39 aderumier
2021-06-02  6:58 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2021-06-02 11:14   ` aderumier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=676f24c5-1645-f14e-8650-8b5cf1715566@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=aderumier@odiso.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@pve.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal