public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: superseded: [PATCH access-control/cluster/network/proxmox{-ve-rs,-perl-rs} v2 00/34] Add support for route maps / prefix lists to SDN
Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 18:38:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62e3133e-a9e8-45a0-8fae-d2169805d2a0@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401143957.386809-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>

https://lore.proxmox.com/pve-devel/20260504160350.395470-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com/T/#t

On 4/1/26 4:39 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> ## Introduction
> 
> This patch adds support for managing route maps and prefix lists to the SDN
> stack. With this patch series, route maps can be applied to the BGP and EVPN
> controller for incoming / outgoing route filtering. There are currently some
> other features in development that would make use of route maps as well, namely:
> 
> * VRF route leaking
> * Route Redistribution for Fabrics
> 
> Prefix Lists can be used for matching inside route map match statements. They
> are implemented so they can be used inside route map match statements for now.
> FRR also provides access lists, which provide a subset of the functionality of
> prefix lists. For that reason, we decided to omit access lists for now, since
> everything can be modeled with prefix lists as well.
> 
> Ran this against the e2e test suite, with all tests passing!
> 
> ## Motivation
> 
> There are a lot of use-cases for enabling users to create their own route-maps,
> which was currently only possible by utilizing frr.conf.local - which was clunky
> and prone to issues. Route maps can be used for filtering in/outgoing routes and
> modifiy them, so users could e.g. only selectively advertise some routes via BGP
> or only import certain EVPN routes from outside.
> 
> It also allows us to programmatically manage route maps via the UI, e.g. for
> deeper EVPN integration in PDM. This opens up a lot of possibilities for
> new features.
> 
> 
> ## Configuration Format
> 
> This patch series adds two new configuration files, route-maps.cfg and
> prefix-lists.cfg in /etc/pve/sdn.
> 
> ### route-maps.cfg
> 
> An example route map configuration looks as follows:
> 
> route-map-entry: example_123
>   action permit
>   match key=vni,value=23487
>   set key=tag,value=23487
> 
> This would create the following FRR route map entry:
> 
> route-map example permit 123
>  match evpn vni 23487
>  set tag 23487
> 
> Every entry in route-maps.cfg maps to an entry in a route map. They are
> identified by their name as well as their ordering number. `example_123`
> specifies the 123th entry in the route map 'example'. The main reason for
> choosing this format is, that having a single section for one route-map would be
> quite unwieldy. It'd require some format like this, which is pretty awkward to
> handle / validate:
> 
> route-map-entry: example
>   action permit,seq=123
>   match key=vni,value=23487,seq=123
>   set key=tag,value=23487,seq=123
> 
> From a UI POV editing singular route map entries seems better as well, and with
> the mapping of section entries to route map entries, a suitable API design
> follows quite naturally and easily maps to the respective section config
> entries, without too much data mangling required.
> 
> 
> ### prefix-lists.cfg
> 
> An example prefix list configuration looks as follows:
> 
> prefix-list: example-1
>   entries action=permit,prefix=192.0.2.0/24
>   entries action=permit,prefix=192.0.2.0/24,le=32
>   entries action=permit,prefix=192.0.2.0/24,le=32,ge=24,seq=123
> 
> This would create the following FRR prefix list:
> 
> ip prefix-list example-1 permit 192.0.2.0/24
> ip prefix-list example-1 permit 192.0.2.0/24 le 32
> ip prefix-list example-1 seq 123 permit 192.0.2.0/24 le 32 ge 24
> 
> 
> ## API endpoints
> 
> This patch series introduces the following API endpoints in the /cluster/sdn
> subfolder:
> 
> 
> ### Route Maps
> 
> GET /route-maps - lists all route map entries
> GET /route-maps/<id> - lists all route map entries for the route map <id>
> GET /route-maps/<id>/<order> - gets the order'th entry in route map <id>
> POST /route-maps - creates a new route map entry
> PUT /route-maps/<id>/<order> - updates the order'th entry in route map <id>
> DELETE /route-maps/<id>/<order> - deletes the order'th entry in route map <id>
> 
> 
> ### Prefix Lists
> 
> GET /prefix-lists - lists all prefix lists
> GET /prefix-lists/<id> - get prefix list <id>
> POST /prefix-lists - create a new prefix list
> PUT /prefix-lists/<id> - update prefix list <id>
> DELETE /prefix-lists/<id> - delete prefix list <id>
> 
> 
> ## Open questions
> 
> How should we handle overriding the auto-generated route maps (e.g. in the EVPN
> controller) and prefix lists?
> 
> Currently this patch series disallows creating any route map / prefix list that
> have the same name as PVE auto-generated ones via the API. They can be
> overridden by creating a new route map and then selecting it in the respective
> entity (e.g. via route-map-in in the EVPN controller). Pre-defined prefix-lists
> cannot currently be overridden, since this usually makes little sense, as they
> are used in the auto-generated route maps, which can be overridden anyway.
> This is the most restrictive option, which leaves the possibility of re-thinking
> our approach depending on if this comes up in the future.
> 
> How should we handle setting custom route maps on exit nodes?
> 
> For exit nodes a special route map entry is generated that disallows importing
> default routes to avoid traffic loops between exit nodes. With the current
> implementation, those entries still get created and executed in order to make it
> easy for users to use route maps on EVPN exit nodes. This also makes it
> impossible to override this behavior, since a route map terminates with the
> first matching entry. The proposed solution for this is a future patch series,
> that allows defining multiple EVPN controllers and limit them to specific nodes.
> Users could then manually build what we currently do on exit nodes together with
> this patch series.
> 
> ## Dependencies
> 
> proxmox-frr depends on proxmox-frr-templates
> proxmox-frr depends on proxmox-sdn-types
> proxmox-ve-config depends on proxmox-sdn-types
> proxmox-ve-config depends on proxmox-frr
> proxmox-perl-rs depends on proxmox-ve-config
> pve-network depends on proxmox-perl-rs
> pve-network depends on pve-cluster
> 
> 
> Changes from v1 (Thanks @Gabriel, @Hannes, @Wolfgang):
> * rebase on top of current master
> * fix newly introduced vtysh tests
> * include missing access-control patch
> * fix an error in the permission API path of GET /route-maps/{route-map-id}
> * fix permission check in list route maps / prefix lists endpoint
> * implement From instead of Into for section config to frr conversions
> * replace core::* imports with std::*
> * improve comments in both pve-rs modules
> * use get() instead of iter().find() in get methods of both pve-rs modules
> * use entry API when creating new entities in both pve-rs modules
> * removed duplicate PrefixList implementation block
> * fixed pending parameter in GET endpoints
> * add route maps / prefix lists to has_pending_changes method
> * fixed change detection for newly introduced fields in prefix lists / route
>   maps
> * fixed reserved id 'loopbacks_ips' for prefix lists (instead of reserving
>   loopback_ips)
> * properly pass delete parameter to the route map update pve-rs method
> * remove additional prefix list / route map rendering methods and just use dump
>   instead in the ve-config FRR integration tests
> * improved documentation of the FRR route map generation logic, so it better
>   explains *how* the configuration gets merged.
> * added another test-case for EVPN zones with a controller with custom route-map
>   + exit nodes
> * implement exit action and call features of route maps
> * jump into user-supplied route maps instead of replacing them directly, to
>   avoid breaking exit-node setups if users do not recreate the auto-generated
>   route map
> * improve indentation of FRR template
> * update tests to reflect changes w.r.t. FRR config generation
> * improve error message on trying to GET non-existing route map entry
> * move the tests from the frr module in route maps / prefix lists to
>   the integration tests in proxmox-ve-config
> * make order u16 instead of u32, because in FRR it is an u16 as well
> * add unit tests to some new types
> * change route map merging logic to overwrite existing route maps, if an entry
>   with the same route map name exists in the section config
> * added separate patch for PrefixListName::new, since the vtysh patch from
>   gabriel hasn't been applied yet, but this patch series requires the new
>   function
> 
> 
> pve-cluster:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (2):
>   cfs: add 'sdn/route-maps.cfg' to observed files
>   cfs: add 'sdn/prefix-lists.cfg' to observed files
> 
>  src/PVE/Cluster.pm  | 2 ++
>  src/pmxcfs/status.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> pve-access-control:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (1):
>   permissions: add ACL path for prefix-lists and route-maps
> 
>  src/PVE/AccessControl.pm | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> proxmox-ve-rs:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (13):
>   frr: add constructor to prefix list name
>   sdn-types: add common route-map helper types
>   frr: change order type to u16
>   frr: implement routemap match/set statements via adjacent tagging
>   frr: implement support for call and exit action
>   frr-templates: change route maps template to adapt to new frr types
>   ve-config: fabrics: adapt frr config generation
>   ve-config: add prefix list section config
>   ve-config: frr: implement frr config generation for prefix lists
>   ve-config: add route map section config
>   ve-config: frr: implement frr config generation for route maps
>   ve-config: add prefix lists integration tests
>   ve-config: add route maps integration tests
> 
>  .../templates/route_maps.jinja                |  19 +-
>  proxmox-frr/Cargo.toml                        |   2 +-
>  proxmox-frr/debian/control                    |   2 +
>  proxmox-frr/src/ser/route_map.rs              | 108 ++-
>  proxmox-sdn-types/src/bgp.rs                  |  62 ++
>  proxmox-sdn-types/src/lib.rs                  | 179 +++++
>  proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/fabric/frr.rs       |  33 +-
>  proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/mod.rs              |   2 +
>  proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/prefix_list.rs      | 220 ++++++
>  proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/route_map.rs        | 728 ++++++++++++++++++
>  proxmox-ve-config/tests/prefix_lists/main.rs  | 112 +++
>  proxmox-ve-config/tests/route_maps/main.rs    | 146 ++++
>  12 files changed, 1561 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 proxmox-sdn-types/src/bgp.rs
>  create mode 100644 proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/prefix_list.rs
>  create mode 100644 proxmox-ve-config/src/sdn/route_map.rs
>  create mode 100644 proxmox-ve-config/tests/prefix_lists/main.rs
>  create mode 100644 proxmox-ve-config/tests/route_maps/main.rs
> 
> 
> proxmox-perl-rs:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (3):
>   pve-rs: sdn: add route maps module
>   pve-rs: sdn: add prefix lists module
>   sdn: add prefix list / route maps to frr config generation helper
> 
>  pve-rs/Cargo.toml                       |   1 +
>  pve-rs/Makefile                         |   2 +
>  pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/mod.rs          |  30 ++-
>  pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/prefix_lists.rs | 192 +++++++++++++++++
>  pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/route_maps.rs   | 262 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 484 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/prefix_lists.rs
>  create mode 100644 pve-rs/src/bindings/sdn/route_maps.rs
> 
> 
> pve-network:
> 
> Stefan Hanreich (15):
>   controller: bgp: evpn: adapt to new match / set frr config syntax
>   sdn: add prefix lists module
>   api2: add prefix list module
>   sdn: add route map module
>   api2: add route maps api module
>   api2: add route map module
>   api2: add route map entry module
>   evpn controller: add route_map_{in,out} parameter
>   bgp controller: allow configuring custom route maps
>   sdn: change detection for route maps / prefix lists
>   sdn: generate route map / prefix list configuration on sdn apply
>   tests: add simple route map test case
>   tests: add bgp evpn route map/prefix list testcase
>   tests: add route map with prefix list testcase
>   tests: add exit node with custom route map testcase
> 
>  src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN.pm                   |  14 +
>  src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/Makefile             |  13 +-
>  src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/PrefixLists.pm       | 254 ++++++++++++++++++
>  src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps.pm         | 140 ++++++++++
>  src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps/Makefile   |   9 +
>  .../API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps/RouteMap.pm    |  93 +++++++
>  .../Network/SDN/RouteMaps/RouteMapEntry.pm    | 138 ++++++++++
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN.pm                        |  30 ++-
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm  |  24 +-
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/EvpnPlugin.pm |  42 +--
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/Plugin.pm     |  14 +
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/Makefile                  |  14 +-
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/PrefixLists.pm            | 134 +++++++++
>  src/PVE/Network/SDN/RouteMaps.pm              | 192 +++++++++++++
>  .../expected_controller_config                |  80 ++++++
>  .../expected_sdn_interfaces                   |  41 +++
>  .../bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/interfaces  |   7 +
>  .../bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/sdn_config  |  86 ++++++
>  .../evpn/routemap/expected_controller_config  |  68 +++++
>  .../evpn/routemap/expected_sdn_interfaces     |  41 +++
>  src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/interfaces       |   7 +
>  src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/sdn_config       |  70 +++++
>  .../expected_controller_config                | 101 +++++++
>  .../expected_sdn_interfaces                   |  41 +++
>  .../zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/interfaces  |   7 +
>  .../zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/sdn_config  |  71 +++++
>  .../expected_controller_config                |  53 ++++
>  .../expected_sdn_interfaces                   |  41 +++
>  .../evpn/routemap_prefix_list/interfaces      |   7 +
>  .../evpn/routemap_prefix_list/sdn_config      |  58 ++++
>  30 files changed, 1858 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/PrefixLists.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps/RouteMap.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/API2/Network/SDN/RouteMaps/RouteMapEntry.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/Network/SDN/PrefixLists.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/PVE/Network/SDN/RouteMaps.pm
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/expected_controller_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/expected_sdn_interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/bgp_evpn_routemap_prefix_list/sdn_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/expected_controller_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/expected_sdn_interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap/sdn_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/expected_controller_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/expected_sdn_interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_exit_node/sdn_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_prefix_list/expected_controller_config
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_prefix_list/expected_sdn_interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_prefix_list/interfaces
>  create mode 100644 src/test/zones/evpn/routemap_prefix_list/sdn_config
> 
> 
> Summary over all repositories:
>   50 files changed, 3911 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 





      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01 14:39 [PATCH access-control/cluster/network/proxmox{-ve-rs,-perl-rs} v2 00/34] Add support for route maps / prefix lists to SDN Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-cluster v2 01/34] cfs: add 'sdn/route-maps.cfg' to observed files Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-cluster v2 02/34] cfs: add 'sdn/prefix-lists.cfg' " Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-access-control v2 03/34] permissions: add ACL path for prefix-lists and route-maps Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 04/34] frr: add constructor to prefix list name Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 05/34] sdn-types: add common route-map helper types Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-02 13:36   ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 06/34] frr: change order type to u16 Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 07/34] frr: implement routemap match/set statements via adjacent tagging Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 08/34] frr: implement support for call and exit action Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 09/34] frr-templates: change route maps template to adapt to new frr types Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 10/34] ve-config: fabrics: adapt frr config generation Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 11/34] ve-config: add prefix list section config Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 12/34] ve-config: frr: implement frr config generation for prefix lists Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-03  7:42   ` Wolfgang Bumiller
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 13/34] ve-config: add route map section config Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 14/34] ve-config: frr: implement frr config generation for route maps Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 15/34] ve-config: add prefix lists integration tests Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-ve-rs v2 16/34] ve-config: add route maps " Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs v2 17/34] pve-rs: sdn: add route maps module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs v2 18/34] pve-rs: sdn: add prefix lists module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH proxmox-perl-rs v2 19/34] sdn: add prefix list / route maps to frr config generation helper Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 20/34] controller: bgp: evpn: adapt to new match / set frr config syntax Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 21/34] sdn: add prefix lists module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 22/34] api2: add prefix list module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 23/34] sdn: add route map module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 24/34] api2: add route maps api module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 25/34] api2: add route map module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 26/34] api2: add route map entry module Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 27/34] evpn controller: add route_map_{in,out} parameter Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 28/34] bgp controller: allow configuring custom route maps Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 29/34] sdn: change detection for route maps / prefix lists Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 30/34] sdn: generate route map / prefix list configuration on sdn apply Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 31/34] tests: add simple route map test case Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 32/34] tests: add bgp evpn route map/prefix list testcase Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 33/34] tests: add route map with prefix " Stefan Hanreich
2026-04-01 14:39 ` [PATCH pve-network v2 34/34] tests: add exit node with custom route map testcase Stefan Hanreich
2026-05-04 16:38 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62e3133e-a9e8-45a0-8fae-d2169805d2a0@proxmox.com \
    --to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal