From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>,
Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH container] setup: support Ubuntu 24.04 Noble
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:43:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60e2a7c7-98d7-4ba3-9548-f31635da7629@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a6f03ef-e673-4612-bb80-eb2509930850@proxmox.com>
Am 29.04.24 um 13:11 schrieb Thomas Lamprecht:
> Am 29/04/2024 um 11:56 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
>> Am 29.04.24 um 11:36 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
>>> Am 29.04.24 um 11:23 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
>>>> Reported in the community forum:
>>>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/145848/#post-658694
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Minimally tested, that an upgrade from an existing 23.04 container
>>>> works, there still is network and no obviously bad messages in the
>>>> container's journal.
>>>>
>>> Hmm, while the upgrade did work, starting from an Ubuntu 24.04 template
>>> and setting a static IP does not seem to work, like described here:
>>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/145848/post-658058
>>
>> Seems like the ordering of the configuration files is the issue. The
>> following would fix it, but probably needs to be special-cased for new
>> Ubuntu (or new systemd, would still need to check where the change came
>> in exactly) not to mess up existing containers, right?
>
> Yes, at least that would reduce regression potential of unknown issues.
So this is not new (already present for Ubuntu 23.10) and stems from the
fact that these images from linuxcontainers.org contain:
> root@CT113:~# cat /etc/netplan/10-lxc.yaml
> network:
> version: 2
> ethernets:
> eth0:
> dhcp4: true
> dhcp-identifier: mac
and that generates a configuration that will be ordered before
ours/preferred by systemd-networkd:
> root@CT113:~# networkctl status eth0
> ● 2: eth0
> Link File: n/a
> Network File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth0.network
Should we still change something in the setup code? I suppose our
template will not have the netplan configuration file and in a way it'd
just be a race to the bottom of being ordered first.
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-29 9:23 Fiona Ebner
2024-04-29 9:36 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-04-29 9:56 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-04-29 11:11 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-04-30 8:43 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
2024-04-30 8:59 ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-04-30 9:18 ` Fiona Ebner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60e2a7c7-98d7-4ba3-9548-f31635da7629@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox