From: "Michael Köppl" <m.koeppl@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 3/5] ha: rules: document crs behavior for split positive resource affinity
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 09:42:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c7e778b-1b9d-4bc0-9ab3-dd74c9c1b318@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250804141204.207216-3-d.kral@proxmox.com>
On 8/4/25 16:12, Daniel Kral wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral@proxmox.com>
> ---
> ha-manager.adoc | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ha-manager.adoc b/ha-manager.adoc
> index 5d75287..e18a14d 100644
> --- a/ha-manager.adoc
> +++ b/ha-manager.adoc
> @@ -787,6 +787,11 @@ HA resources `vm:101` and `vm:102` are each in a positive resource affinity
> rule, then it is the same as if `vm:100`, `vm:101` and `vm:102` would have been
> in a single positive resource affinity rule.
>
> +NOTE: If the HA resources of a positive resource affinity rule are currently
> +running on different nodes, the CRS will move the HA resources to the node,
> +where most of them are running already. If there is a tie in the HA resource
> +count, the node with the alphabetically first name is chosen.
maybe something like:
"the node whose name appears first alphabetically is selected"
just a suggestion, though
> +
> However, suppose there are computationally expensive, and/or distributed
> programs running on the HA resources `vm:200` and `ct:300`, for example,
> sharded database instances. In that case, running them on the same node could
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-05 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-04 14:11 [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/5] ha: affinity rules: simplify overly verbose rule conflicts and errors section Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 14:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 2/5] ha: rules: update about mixed usage of node and resource affinity rules Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 15:09 ` Hannes Duerr
2025-08-05 7:15 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 14:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 3/5] ha: rules: document crs behavior for split positive resource affinity Daniel Kral
2025-08-05 7:42 ` Michael Köppl [this message]
2025-08-05 7:50 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 14:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 4/5] ha: mark ha groups as deprecated and note migration to node affinity rules Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 14:11 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 5/5] ha: replace in-text references to ha groups with ha rules Daniel Kral
2025-08-04 15:24 ` Hannes Duerr
2025-08-05 7:39 ` Daniel Kral
2025-08-05 7:41 ` Michael Köppl
2025-08-05 7:47 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH docs 1/5] ha: affinity rules: simplify overly verbose rule conflicts and errors section Michael Köppl
2025-08-05 8:01 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Daniel Kral
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c7e778b-1b9d-4bc0-9ab3-dd74c9c1b318@proxmox.com \
--to=m.koeppl@proxmox.com \
--cc=d.kral@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox