public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [RFC qemu-server] apt hook: warn against using 'upgrade' command
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:58:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b91cdd6-abfc-4320-81a6-e973e4b6b80c@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240906104019.40450-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com>

Am 06/09/2024 um 12:40 schrieb Fiona Ebner:
> Many people will use 'upgrade' instead of 'full-upgrade' or
> 'dist-upgrade' (e.g. [0][1]) despite the documentation explicitly
> mentioning 'dist-upgrade' [3]. Proxmox VE uses different packaging
> guarantees than Debian and using 'upgrade' can lead to a broken
> system [2].
> 
> The match is kept simple, to not accidentally catch things like
>> -o 'foo=bar upgrade baz'
> and trip up advanced users.
> 
> It does not catch invocations with '-y' either, making it less likely
> to break automated user scripts. Although they should not use
> 'upgrade' either, it still would be bad to break them. If the risk is
> still considered too high, this change should wait until a major or
> at least point release.
> 
> To avoid false positives, it would be necessary to properly parse
> options, which is likely not worth the effort.
> 
> A downside is that the hook is only invoked after the user confirms
> the upgrade, but there doesn't seem to be an early enough hook entry
> (DPkg::Pre-Invoke is also too late). Since this is just an additional
> safety warning to guide new users, it should still be good enough.
> 
> [0]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/150217/post-680158
> [1]: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/140580/post-630419
> [2]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Proxmox/comments/ujqig9/use_apt_distupgrade_or_the_gui_not_apt_upgrade/
> [3]: https://pve.proxmox.com/pve-docs/chapter-sysadmin.html#system_software_updates
> 

yeah, it's something I considered here and then but never pulled through,
as it just somehow doesn't feel right...

But it's definitively a real problem, and so I surely won't block this on
the basis of some gut feeling, I'd rather like to hear Fabian's opinion on
it.


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-06 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-06 10:40 Fiona Ebner
2024-09-06 10:42 ` Fiona Ebner
2024-09-06 11:01 ` Dominik Csapak
2024-09-06 16:54   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-09-06 12:16 ` Alexander Zeidler
2024-09-06 16:56   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2024-09-06 16:58 ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2024-09-09  7:48   ` Fabian Grünbichler
2024-09-09  7:52     ` Fiona Ebner
2024-09-09  7:57       ` Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5b91cdd6-abfc-4320-81a6-e973e4b6b80c@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal