* [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay
@ 2021-04-09 12:21 Alexandre Bruyelles
2021-04-09 13:50 ` alexandre derumier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Bruyelles @ 2021-04-09 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pve-devel; +Cc: Alexandre Bruyelles
From: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
Multihop is required when the bgpd are running across
a pair of MLAG routers.
In such scenario, TCP trafic from Proxmox to router A
may pass through router B, which will decrease the TTL.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
---
PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
index e5d8490..69436a0 100644
--- a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
+++ b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ sub generate_controller_config {
push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP peer-group";
push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP remote-as $remoteas";
push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP bfd";
+ push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3";
}
# BGP peers
--
2.31.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay
2021-04-09 12:21 [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay Alexandre Bruyelles
@ 2021-04-09 13:50 ` alexandre derumier
2021-04-09 15:40 ` px
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: alexandre derumier @ 2021-04-09 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Proxmox VE development discussion, Alexandre Bruyelles
Cc: Alexandre Bruyelles
Hi,
any impact to enable it by default ?
if user have only 1 peer for example ?
maybe is is better to only enable it if we have more than 1 peer in the
group ?
and check that we use ebgp.
something like:
push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3" if $ebgp && scalar @peers > 1;
On 09/04/2021 14:21, Alexandre Bruyelles wrote:
> From: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>
> Multihop is required when the bgpd are running across
> a pair of MLAG routers.
> In such scenario, TCP trafic from Proxmox to router A
> may pass through router B, which will decrease the TTL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
> ---
> PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
> index e5d8490..69436a0 100644
> --- a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
> +++ b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ sub generate_controller_config {
> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP peer-group";
> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP remote-as $remoteas";
> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP bfd";
> + push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3";
> }
>
> # BGP peers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay
2021-04-09 13:50 ` alexandre derumier
@ 2021-04-09 15:40 ` px
2021-04-10 10:37 ` alexandre derumier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: px @ 2021-04-09 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alexandre derumier, Proxmox VE development discussion
Hello,
In Proxmox setup, there is no known serious issue
In contrary to "ttl security" (aka GTSM), multihop is not a security feature
I don't think there is a drawback to the proposed patch
However, disabling multihop when there is only one peer should also
works, so your proposal shall work as well
As you wish :)
Best regards,
On 4/9/21 3:50 PM, alexandre derumier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any impact to enable it by default ?
>
> if user have only 1 peer for example ?
>
> maybe is is better to only enable it if we have more than 1 peer in the
> group ?
>
> and check that we use ebgp.
>
> something like:
>
> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3" if $ebgp &&
> scalar @peers > 1;
>
>
> On 09/04/2021 14:21, Alexandre Bruyelles wrote:
>> From: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>>
>> Multihop is required when the bgpd are running across
>> a pair of MLAG routers.
>> In such scenario, TCP trafic from Proxmox to router A
>> may pass through router B, which will decrease the TTL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>> ---
>> PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>> b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>> index e5d8490..69436a0 100644
>> --- a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>> +++ b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ sub generate_controller_config {
>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP peer-group";
>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP remote-as $remoteas";
>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP bfd";
>> + push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3";
>> }
>> # BGP peers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay
2021-04-09 15:40 ` px
@ 2021-04-10 10:37 ` alexandre derumier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: alexandre derumier @ 2021-04-10 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: px, Proxmox VE development discussion
I just send a patch with an explicit option to add ebgp-multihop, as
it's a tunable value, and maybe users could have differents setup with
more hops.
On 09/04/2021 17:40, px@jack.fr.eu.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In Proxmox setup, there is no known serious issue
>
> In contrary to "ttl security" (aka GTSM), multihop is not a security
> feature
>
> I don't think there is a drawback to the proposed patch
> However, disabling multihop when there is only one peer should also
> works, so your proposal shall work as well
>
> As you wish :)
>
> Best regards,
>
> On 4/9/21 3:50 PM, alexandre derumier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> any impact to enable it by default ?
>>
>> if user have only 1 peer for example ?
>>
>> maybe is is better to only enable it if we have more than 1 peer in
>> the group ?
>>
>> and check that we use ebgp.
>>
>> something like:
>>
>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3" if $ebgp &&
>> scalar @peers > 1;
>>
>>
>> On 09/04/2021 14:21, Alexandre Bruyelles wrote:
>>> From: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>>>
>>> Multihop is required when the bgpd are running across
>>> a pair of MLAG routers.
>>> In such scenario, TCP trafic from Proxmox to router A
>>> may pass through router B, which will decrease the TTL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bruyelles <git@jack.fr.eu.org>
>>> ---
>>> PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> index e5d8490..69436a0 100644
>>> --- a/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> +++ b/PVE/Network/SDN/Controllers/BgpPlugin.pm
>>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ sub generate_controller_config {
>>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP peer-group";
>>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP remote-as $remoteas";
>>> push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP bfd";
>>> + push @controller_config, "neighbor BGP ebgp-multihop 3";
>>> }
>>> # BGP peers
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-04-10 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-09 12:21 [pve-devel] [PATCH] controllers: bgp: enable multihop on the underlay Alexandre Bruyelles
2021-04-09 13:50 ` alexandre derumier
2021-04-09 15:40 ` px
2021-04-10 10:37 ` alexandre derumier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox