public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Filip Schauer <f.schauer@proxmox.com>
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
	Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH qemu-server] Properly identify the CPU architecture of 32-bit VMs
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:39:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <544700e6-14ca-4db8-88b4-117202a972d9@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474c3df6-a8ed-4294-8e46-37c3f2008689@proxmox.com>

It's actually not a different binary. qemu-system-i386 is a symlink that
points to qemu-system-x86_64. But still this does indeed break migration
between a node that has this patch applied and another node without the
patch.

A patch v2 that only adds the check is available here:
https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2023-December/061034.html

On 11/12/2023 15:37, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> Am 11.12.23 um 15:12 schrieb Filip Schauer:
>> @@ -3293,11 +3293,12 @@ sub is_native($) {
>>   
>>   sub get_vm_arch {
>>       my ($conf) = @_;
>> -    return $conf->{arch} // get_host_arch();
>> +    return $conf->{arch} // cpu_type_to_arch($conf->{cpu}) // get_host_arch();
>>   }
>>   
>>   my $default_machines = {
>>       x86_64 => 'pc',
>> +    i386 => 'pc',
>>       aarch64 => 'virt',
>>   };
>>   
>> @@ -3390,6 +3391,7 @@ sub get_ovmf_files($$$) {
>>   
>>   my $Arch2Qemu = {
>>       aarch64 => '/usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64',
>> +    i386 => '/usr/bin/qemu-system-i386',
>>       x86_64 => '/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64',
> Am I understanding correctly that you would automatically pick a
> different binary depending on the CPU type? Does that actually work with
> KVM and/or live migration, i.e. source was started with
> qemu-system-x86_64 and now suddenly on the target with qemu-system-i386?
>
> And even if it does, I'd rather not add support for running machines
> with this binary. Especially if the only reason is to have this new
> check. Once the new binary is there, we'd need to support it (even if
> it's not prominently exposed).
>
> If there is no easy way to do the check otherwise, I'd rather wait until
> enough users complain and re-consider how to implement the check only then.




  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-12 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-11 14:12 Filip Schauer
2023-12-11 14:37 ` Fiona Ebner
2023-12-12 10:39   ` Filip Schauer [this message]
2023-12-12 11:48     ` Fiona Ebner
2023-12-13 17:31       ` Filip Schauer
2023-12-14  9:13         ` Fiona Ebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=544700e6-14ca-4db8-88b4-117202a972d9@proxmox.com \
    --to=f.schauer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal