public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
To: pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-common v2 1/1] fix #7153: iproute2: consider bonds as physical bridge ports
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:17:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b03e6f0-a436-4ec7-8242-f32f745998de@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251216160513.360391-1-s.hanreich@proxmox.com>

tested by a user in the forum:

https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/problem-migrating-vms-in-a-proxmox-9-cluster-with-vlan-on-vmbr0.177334/#post-825321

On 12/16/25 5:05 PM, Stefan Hanreich wrote:
> The new check did not consider bonds, since ip_link_is_physical only
> returns true for physical interfaces - but not bonds. Add a new
> function to check for bonds explicitly and use it when checking for
> bridge ports in activate_bridge_vlan.
> 
> This bug caused VMs with network devices with VLAN tags, on
> non-vlan-aware bridges, to not get started / migrated.
> 
> Fixes: 057f62f7
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hanreich <s.hanreich@proxmox.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
> * improved commit message
> * add missing definedness check
> 
>  src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm b/src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm
> index 5208d93..c60a91d 100644
> --- a/src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm
> +++ b/src/PVE/IPRoute2.pm
> @@ -32,6 +32,14 @@ sub ip_link_is_physical($ip_link) {
>          && (!defined($ip_link->{linkinfo}) || !defined($ip_link->{linkinfo}->{info_kind}));
>  }
>  
> +sub ip_link_is_bond($ip_link) {
> +    return
> +        $ip_link->{link_type} eq 'ether'
> +        && defined($ip_link->{linkinfo})
> +        && defined($ip_link->{linkinfo}->{info_kind})
> +        && $ip_link->{linkinfo}->{info_kind} eq 'bond';
> +}
> +
>  sub ip_link_is_bridge($ip_link) {
>      return
>          defined($ip_link->{linkinfo})
> @@ -67,7 +75,8 @@ sub get_physical_bridge_ports($bridge, $ip_links = undef) {
>      }
>  
>      return grep {
> -        ip_link_is_physical($ip_links->{$_}) && $ip_links->{$_}->{master} eq $bridge
> +        (ip_link_is_physical($ip_links->{$_}) || ip_link_is_bond($ip_links->{$_}))
> +            && defined($ip_links->{$_}->{master}) && $ip_links->{$_}->{master} eq $bridge
>      } keys $ip_links->%*;
>  }
>  



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-16 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-16 16:05 Stefan Hanreich
2025-12-16 16:17 ` Stefan Hanreich [this message]
2025-12-17 14:30 ` Stoiko Ivanov
2025-12-17 17:26 ` Stefan Hanreich
2025-12-17 21:27 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b03e6f0-a436-4ec7-8242-f32f745998de@proxmox.com \
    --to=s.hanreich@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal