From: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
To: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com>,
"Proxmox VE development discussion" <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Cc: w.bumiller@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH storage] plugin: volume snapshot info: untaint snapshot filename
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 13:08:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3761b4ee-dc20-47d7-a3fa-43e841c20150@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1753696364.bhxw524hb8.astroid@yuna.none>
Am 28.07.25 um 11:59 AM schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
> On July 25, 2025 5:48 pm, Friedrich Weber wrote:
>> Without untainting, offline-deleting a volume-chain snapshot on a
>> directory storage via the GUI fails with an "Insecure dependecy in
>> exec [...]" error, because volume_snapshot_delete uses the filename
>> its qemu-img invocation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Friedrich Weber <f.weber@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> I'm not too familiar with the taint mode. Allowing anything that
>> starts with a slash seems a little lax, but I don't know if we can do
>> any meaningful validation here -- let me know if we can.
>>
>> src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm b/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> index a817186..2bd05bd 100644
>> --- a/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> +++ b/src/PVE/Storage/Plugin.pm
>> @@ -1789,6 +1789,7 @@ sub volume_snapshot_info {
>> my $snapshots = $json_decode;
>> for my $snap (@$snapshots) {
>> my $snapfile = $snap->{filename};
>> + ($snapfile) = $snapfile =~ m|^(/.*)|; # untaint
>
> we also validate that the path matches our naming scheme below, but that
> is mostly concerned with the final component..
>
> I called out that the references for backing images are not relative in
> a previous iteration of the qcow2 patch series, it seems that slipped
> through?
>
> right now, it's not possible to change the backing directory path of the
> storage, or the LVM VG without breaking all snapshot chains stored
> there because all the back references to snapshots are using absolute
> paths instead of relative ones..
>
> if we fix that (and we probably should?), then the untainting RE here
> would become wrong again..
Agreed, making the backing paths relative (for new volumes) sounds
sensible and then we can also validate them better :)
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 15:48 Friedrich Weber
2025-07-28 9:59 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-07-28 11:08 ` Fiona Ebner [this message]
2025-07-28 12:21 ` Fabian Grünbichler
2025-07-28 13:30 ` Friedrich Weber
2025-07-28 13:32 ` Friedrich Weber
2025-07-31 12:37 ` Friedrich Weber
2025-07-31 12:55 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-07-28 13:20 ` [pve-devel] applied: " Fabian Grünbichler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3761b4ee-dc20-47d7-a3fa-43e841c20150@proxmox.com \
--to=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.gruenbichler@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
--cc=w.bumiller@proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox