public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Matthias Heiserer <m.heiserer@proxmox.com>,
	Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/2] GUI: efi disk: use correct version with aarch64
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:17:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <30584935-e2b2-c04a-0df2-ff2378a727f7@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410d44a8-95d2-7f99-61fb-8018b49e4df8@proxmox.com>

Am 20/01/2023 um 13:56 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
> On 18.01.2023 15:07, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
>> for subject: s/GUI/ui/ to better match the predominantly used one.
>>
>> Am 17/01/2023 um 13:17 schrieb Matthias Heiserer:
>>> Sets the EFI version to 2m when arch=aarch64.
>>>
>>> When the VM has arch=aarch64, creating an EFI disk failed with
>>> "Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /usr/share/perl5/PVE/QemuServer.pm line 3382. (500)"
>>>
>>> That's because we only have EFI 2m available for aarch64.
>>>
>>> Reported in the forum: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/121160/
>>>
>>
>> If we go this route I'd also enforce using the correct one when changing
>> or creating VMs via the API.
> When creating via the API (and not setting a type) the default is used, which works with aarch64. Only if 4m is explicitly set, it errors.
> The ui user can't set the version, that's why I changed it there.

but your quoted error makes it obvious that the backend doesn't really
catches the illegal combination explicitly, or am I'm missing something?

> 
>>
>> Two possible alternatives:
>> - auto-select the existing one in the backend; drawback: if we ever add
>>    another size for the AAVMF image we need to take extra/special care to
>>    avoid breaking old systems. >
>> - build also an AAVMF image with 4MB, but one would need to check if this
>>    is really possible in the first place or if there are other drawbacks.
> To me, the second option seems better, should it work.
> I don't like the idea of letting the user provide a parameter and silently ignoring it.

yeah, I'd favor that one too




  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 12:17 Matthias Heiserer
2023-01-17 12:17 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 2/2] GUI: efi disk: cleanup - var to const Matthias Heiserer
2023-01-18 14:03   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-01-20 11:16     ` Matthias Heiserer
2023-01-20 13:59       ` Thomas Lamprecht
2023-01-18 14:07 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH manager 1/2] GUI: efi disk: use correct version with aarch64 Thomas Lamprecht
2023-01-20 12:56   ` Matthias Heiserer
2023-01-20 13:17     ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]
2023-01-20 14:18       ` Matthias Heiserer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=30584935-e2b2-c04a-0df2-ff2378a727f7@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=m.heiserer@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal