public inbox for pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lamprecht@proxmox.com>
To: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>,
	n.frey@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 5/5] api: add replication config read return schema
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:18:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fdb83eb-7e9f-4046-804c-8677dfb9cb96@proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250919093915.21641-6-n.frey@proxmox.com>

Am 19.09.25 um 11:40 schrieb n.frey@proxmox.com:
> From: Nicolas Frey <n.frey@proxmox.com>
 
Ah, you actually figured about re-using the SectionConfig schema
here, but some commit message would be really warranted here to
explain why it's fine to use the *create* schema as *return*
schema. Don't get me wrong, that might be fine (I expect it too
from a gut feeling, but did not actually checked and reasoned),
but such things really need a basic rationale to describe why
it actually is. And if it is then you can naturally switch the
ACME return endpoint also to such a style.


> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frey <n.frey@proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/API2/ReplicationConfig.pm | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/ReplicationConfig.pm b/PVE/API2/ReplicationConfig.pm
> index 307ebe69..515afcec 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/ReplicationConfig.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/ReplicationConfig.pm
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method({
>              id => get_standard_option('pve-replication-id'),
>          },
>      },
> -    returns => { type => 'object' },
> +    returns => PVE::ReplicationConfig->createSchema(),
>      code => sub {
>          my ($param) = @_;
>  



_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel


      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-22 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-19  9:33 [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 0/5] api: add return schemas and fix grammar in ifupdown2 error message n.frey
2025-09-19  9:33 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 1/5] Fix grammar in ifupdown2 version " n.frey
2025-09-22 16:49   ` [pve-devel] applied: " Thomas Lamprecht
2025-09-19  9:33 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 2/5] api: add ACME plugin return schema n.frey
2025-09-22 16:47   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-09-19  9:33 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 3/5] api: add APT versions " n.frey
2025-09-22 17:01   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-09-19  9:33 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 4/5] api: add service state " n.frey
2025-09-22 17:16   ` Thomas Lamprecht
2025-09-19  9:33 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH pve-manager 5/5] api: add replication config read " n.frey
2025-09-22 17:18   ` Thomas Lamprecht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fdb83eb-7e9f-4046-804c-8677dfb9cb96@proxmox.com \
    --to=t.lamprecht@proxmox.com \
    --cc=n.frey@proxmox.com \
    --cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Service provided by Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH | Privacy | Legal