From: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov@proxmox.com>
To: Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Cc: Proxmox VE development discussion <pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com>
Subject: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 2/2] common: pinning: use pve-iface regular expression for validation
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 12:46:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251201124626.2ddecb15@rosa.proxmox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <623c44ed-bbad-4c3a-b5c1-66f5a47f8d5c@proxmox.com>
Nice catch - Thanks!
On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:53:53 +0100
Fiona Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com> wrote:
> Am 26.11.25 um 7:08 PM schrieb Stoiko Ivanov:
> > + static RE: OnceLock<Regex> = OnceLock::new();
> > + let re = RE.get_or_init(|| {
> > + RegexBuilder::new(r"^[a-z][a-z0-9_]{1,20}([:\.]\d+)?$")
>
> Should the later part with a colon really be allowed? On the new test
> ISO, a name like 'nicat:3' will be accepted, but won't actually work
> later when booting:
given the back and forth [0] of trying to get this in sync with
pve-common's JSONSchema.pm I did use the literal regex from there on
purpose...
> "Interface name is not valid or too long, ignoring assignment: nicat:3"
...not considering that these are interface-names for the kernel, while
`prefix:\d` and `prefix\.\d` are syntax for /etc/network/interfaces
(the former for aliaseses (having a second ip/network on one interface),
the latter for VLAN tags).
It would probably make sense to add a separate validation for kernel iface
names somewhere centrally and use/reference that (everywhere), but I'd like
to avoid to deviate here from the one thing we (afaict?) always reference
when we deal with "NIC names".
Apart from disallowing the `([:\.]\d+)?` trailer - this would also
restrict the length to 15 characters fwict.
In practical terms I don't think keeping it as is has a large potential
for regression (not expecting many users to touch the advanced mappings,
and even if they add :\d there they'd notice after rebooting the first
time).
>
> I guess the dot can make sense if there are multiple NICs, so you could
> have e.g. 'nic0' and 'nic0.3'?
see above - afaict in Debian/ifupdown terms these are used for
vlan-interfaces (and might lead to unexpected results if used for plain
nic-names (did not test this though))
[0] e.g.
https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20251113135023.1038305-1-c.heiss@proxmox.com/
https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20251118151532.592423-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/
https://lore.proxmox.com/all/20251126180819.817240-1-s.ivanov@proxmox.com/
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 18:07 [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 0/2] sync allowed nic-names with pve-common by using the same regex Stoiko Ivanov
2025-11-26 18:07 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 1/2] sys: net: use literal pve-iface regular expression for validation Stoiko Ivanov
2025-11-26 18:07 ` [pve-devel] [PATCH installer 2/2] common: pinning: use " Stoiko Ivanov
2025-12-01 10:53 ` Fiona Ebner
2025-12-01 11:46 ` Stoiko Ivanov [this message]
2025-11-27 7:18 ` [pve-devel] applied: [PATCH installer 0/2] sync allowed nic-names with pve-common by using the same regex Thomas Lamprecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251201124626.2ddecb15@rosa.proxmox.com \
--to=s.ivanov@proxmox.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox